Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2020 Sep-Oct:37:101832.
doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101832. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

Body temperature screening to identify SARS-CoV-2 infected young adult travellers is ineffective

Affiliations
Comment

Body temperature screening to identify SARS-CoV-2 infected young adult travellers is ineffective

Michel Bielecki et al. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Sep-Oct.
No abstract available

Keywords: Coronavirus Disease-19; Fever; Screening; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Probability density of temperature of healthy controls (black, n = 703 measurements of 132 individuals) and of patients presenting symptomatically and testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 by nasopharyngeal swab at the time of presentation (red, n = 81). While the temperature of patients with COVID-19 was significantly higher than of healthy controls, the curves overlap considerably. (B) Sensitivity and specificity of temperature as a screening tool. While a temperature cut-off value of 37.1% does allow identification of 63% of the cases, the specificity is only 95% and probably over-estimated. A fever cut-off of 38 °C only allows identification of the minority of cases, while an even higher cut-off value of 38.5 °C misses 92% of all COVID-19 patients at the time of presentation. (C) Longitudinal change of temperature in 84 patients with COVID-19. Temperature curves of individual patients. Fever (>= 38 °C is shown in red). No patient had a fever after day 4. (D) Histogram of the number fever-days with at least one measurement >38 °C of 84 patients. 83% of our cohort never exhibited fever (0 days > 38°).

Comment on

References

    1. Bwire G.M., Paulo L.S. Coronavirus disease-2019: is fever an adequate screening for the returning travelers? Trop Med Health. 2020;48:14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitra B., Luckhoff C., Mitchell R.D., O'Reilly G., Smit D.V., Cameron P.A. Temperature screening has negligible value for control of COVID ‐19. Emerg Med Australasia (EMA) 2020 doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13578. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bielecki M., Züst R., Siegrist D., Meyerhofer D., Crameri G.A.G., Stanga Z.G. Social distancing alters the clinical course of COVID-19 in young adults: a comparative cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa889. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mouchtouri V.A., Christoforidou E.P., An der Heiden M., Menel Lemos C., Fanos M., Rexroth U. Exit and entry screening practices for infectious diseases among travelers at points of entry: looking for evidence on public health impact. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2019;16 doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234638. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quilty B.J., Clifford S., Flasche S., Eggo R.M., CMMID nCoV working group Effectiveness of airport screening at detecting travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Euro Surveill. 2020;25 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.5.2000080. - DOI - PMC - PubMed