Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug 5;17(16):5669.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165669.

Review of Drug Utilization Studies in Neonatal Units: A Global Perspective

Affiliations
Review

Review of Drug Utilization Studies in Neonatal Units: A Global Perspective

Asma Al-Turkait et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Rational prescribing is challenging in neonatology. Drug utilization studies help identify and define the problem. We performed a review of the literature on drug use in neonatal units and describe global variations. We searched databases (EMBASE, CINAHL and Medline) from inception to July 2020, screened studies and extracted relevant data (two reviewers). The search revealed 573 studies of which 84 were included. India (n = 14) and the USA (n = 13) reported the most. Data collection was prospective (n = 56) and retrospective (n = 26), mostly (n = 52) from one center only. Sixty studies described general drug use in 34 to 450,386 infants (median (IQR) 190 (91-767)) over a median (IQR) of 6 (3-18) months. Of the participants, 20-87% were preterm. The mean number of drugs per infant (range 11.1 to 1.7, pooled mean (SD) 4 (2.4)) was high with some reporting very high burden (≥30 drugs per infant in 8 studies). This was not associated with the proportion of preterm infants included. Antibiotics were the most frequently used drug. Drug use patterns were generally uniform with some variation in antibiotic use and more use of phenobarbitone in Asia. This study provides a global perspective on drug utilization in neonates and highlights the need for better quality information to assess rational prescribing.

Keywords: antibiotics; care; drug use review; infants; neonatal intensive; newborn.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare no conflict of interest. A.A.-T.—none to declare. I.C.—is on the Editorial Board of IJERPH. L.S.—none to declare. S.O.—has research funding from the National Institute of Health Research and The Medical Research Council, UK and local charities of the University Hospitals of Derby and Burton and the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trusts. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of studies for inclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Countries of origin of reports of drug utilization in neonatal units.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of unique drugs per infant reported in drug utilization studies in neonatal units.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of drugs per infant and proportion of preterm infants included in the study.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Drugs reported as one of 10 most frequently prescribed in 44 neonatal drug utilization studies. Bars represent the number of studies that reported each drug as one of its 10 most frequently prescribed.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Drugs reported as one of 10 most frequently prescribed antibiotics in neonatal drug utilization studies. (Bars represent the number of studies that reported each drug as one of its 10 most frequently prescribed antibiotic).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . International Working Group for Drug Statistics Methodology, Organizzazione Mondiale Della Sanità, Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, Organizzazione Mondiale Della Sanità, Collaborating Centre for Drug Utilization Research and clinical Pharmacological Services. Introduction to Drug Utilization Research. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2003.
    1. Avorn J. The Psychology of Clinical Decision Making—Implications for Medication Use. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:689–691. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1714987. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allegaert K., Simons S., Van Den Anker J. Research on medication use in the neonatal intensive care unit. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019;12:343–353. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1580569. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hozo S.P., Djulbegovic B., Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2005;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cantey J.B., Wozniak P.S., Sánchez P.J. Prospective surveillance of antibiotic use in the neonatal intensive care unit: Results from the SCOUT study. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2015;34:267–272. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000542. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types