Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 13:15:1129-1139.
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S253236. eCollection 2020.

Home-Based Cognitively Assistive Robots: Maximizing Cognitive Functioning and Maintaining Independence in Older Adults Without Dementia

Affiliations
Review

Home-Based Cognitively Assistive Robots: Maximizing Cognitive Functioning and Maintaining Independence in Older Adults Without Dementia

Ryan Van Patten et al. Clin Interv Aging. .

Abstract

Promoting health and prolonging independence in the home is a priority for older adults, caregivers, clinicians, and society at large. Rapidly developing robotics technology provides a platform for interventions, with the fields of physically and socially assistive robots expanding in recent years. However, less attention has been paid to using robots to enhance the cognitive health of older adults. The goal of this review is to synthesize the current literature on home-based cognitively assistive robots (CAR) in older adults without dementia and to provide suggestions to improve the quality of the scientific evidence in this subfield. First, we set the stage for CAR by: a) introducing the field of robotics to improve health, b) summarizing evidence emphasizing the importance of home-based interventions for older adults, c) reviewing literature on robot acceptability in older adults, d) highlighting important ethical issues in healthcare robotics, and e) reviewing current findings on socially assistive robots, with a focus on translating findings to the CAR context. With this foundation in place, we then review the literature on CAR, identifying gaps and limitations of current evidence, and proposing future directions for research. We conclude that CAR is promising and feasible and that there is a need for more methodologically rigorous evaluations of CAR to promote prolonged home-based independence in older adults.

Keywords: aging; autonomy; cognitive status; healthy aging; successful aging; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest were declared. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the authorship and/or publication of this article: Funding for this study was provided, in part, by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01MH094151-01 to D.V.J. [PI]), by the National Institute of Mental Health T32 Geriatric Mental Health Program (grant MH019934 to D.V.J. and E.W.T. [PIs]), the Stein Institute for Research on Aging at the University of California, San Diego.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beer JM, Smarr C-A, Chen TL, et al. The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ’12; ACM Press: 2012:335. doi:10.1145/2157689.2157806 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pruchno R. Technology and aging: an evolving partnership. Gerontologist. 2019;59(1):1–5. doi:10.1093/geront/gny153 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riek LD. Healthcare robotics. Commun ACM. 2017;60(11):68–78. doi:10.1145/3127874 - DOI
    1. Bogue R. Europe leads the way in assistive robots for the elderly. Ind Robot Int J. 2017;44(3):253–258. doi:10.1108/IR-02-2017-0041 - DOI
    1. Zafrani O, Nimrod G. Towards a holistic approach to studying human–robot interaction in later life. Gerontologist. 2019;59(1):e26–e36. doi:10.1093/geront/gny077 - DOI - PubMed