Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 16:13:6927-6935.
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S257798. eCollection 2020.

Evaluating Solid Lung Adenocarcinoma Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Gene Rearrangement Using Noninvasive Radiomics Biomarkers

Affiliations

Evaluating Solid Lung Adenocarcinoma Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Gene Rearrangement Using Noninvasive Radiomics Biomarkers

De-Ning Ma et al. Onco Targets Ther. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a radiogenomics classifier to assess anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement status in pretreated solid lung adenocarcinoma noninvasively.

Materials and methods: This study consisted of 140 consecutive pretreated solid lung adenocarcinoma patients with complete enhanced CT scans who were tested for both EGFR mutations and ALK status. Pre-contrast CT and standard post-contrast CT radiogenomics machine learning classifiers were designed as two separate classifiers. In each classifier, dataset was randomly split into training and independent testing group on a 7:3 ratio, accordingly subjected to a 5-fold cross-validation. After normalization, best feature subsets were selected by Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) or recursive feature elimination (RFE), whereupon a radiomics classifier was built with support vector machine (SVM). The discriminating performance was assessed with the area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results: In classifier one, 98 cases were selected as training data set, 42 cases as independent testing data set. In classifier two, 87 cases were selected as training data set, 37 cases as independent testing data set. Both classifiers extracted 851 radiomics features. The top 25 pre-contrast features and top 19 post-contrast features were selected to build optimal ALK+ radiogenomics classifiers accordingly. The accuracies, AUCs, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of pre-contrast CT classifier were 78.57%, 80.10% (CI: 0.6538-0.9222), 71.43%, 82.14%, 66.67%, and 85.19%, respectively. Those results of standard post-contrast CT classifier were 81.08%, 82.85% (CI: 0.6630-0.9567), 76.92%, 83.33%, 71.43%, and 86.96%.

Conclusion: Solid lung adenocarcinoma ALK+ radiogenomics classifier of standard post-contrast CT radiomics biomarkers produced superior performance compared with that of pre-contrast one, suggesting that post-contrast CT radiomics should be recommended in the context of solid lung adenocarcinoma radiogenomics AI. Standard post-contrast CT machine learning radiogenomics classifier could help precisely identify solid adenocarcinoma ALK rearrangement status, which may act as a pragmatic and cost-efficient substitute for traditional invasive ALK status test.

Keywords: SVM; anaplastic lymphoma kinase; epidermal growth factor receptor; non-small cell lung cancer; radiogenomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of this study. (A) Patients. (B) Image Acquisition. (C) ROI Segmentation. (D) Feature Extraction and Selection. (E) SVM Construction and Validation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CT images obtained in a 49-year old woman with ALK rearrangement solid lung adenocarcinoma. Transverse mediastinal window, 5 mm slice thickness. (A and B) Pre-contrast scans. (C and D) Standard post-contrast scans.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results of classifier 1. (A) The receiver-operating characteristic curve of classifier 1. (B) Selection of optimal features using ANOVA. (C) Contribution of selected radiomics features of classifier 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results of classifier 2. (A) The receiver-operating characteristic curve of classifier 2. (B) Selection of optimal features using RFE. (C) Contribution of selected radiomics features of classifier 2.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. - PubMed
    1. Choi CM, Kim MY, Hwang HJ, Lee JB, Kim WS. Advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung: comparison of CT characteristics of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement and those with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Radiology. 2015;275(1):272–279. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140848 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoang T, Myung SK, Pham TT, Park B. Efficacy of crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Cancers. 2020;12(3):526. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030526 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minguet J, Smith KH, Bramlage P. Targeted therapies for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer–recent advances and future perspectives. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(11):2549–2561. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29915 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tian HX, Zhang XC, Yang JJ, et al. Clinical characteristics and sequence complexity of anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene fusions in Chinese lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer. 2017;114:90–95. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.11.001 - DOI - PubMed