Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 16:11:1701.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01701. eCollection 2020.

Peer Feedback Reflects the Mindset and Academic Motivation of Learners

Affiliations

Peer Feedback Reflects the Mindset and Academic Motivation of Learners

Junfeng Zhang et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Given that little is known how peer feedback reflects adolescents' academic well-being in different cultures, this study investigates, by means of multiple-group structural equation modeling (SEM), the influence of peer feedback on the mindset and academic motivation of Chinese (N = 992) and Finnish (N = 870) students in the fourth to the ninth school grades. Within this investigation, we also explore the culture-invariant and culture-dependent nature of student feedback, mindset and academic motivation. The results indicate that the way students praise their peers in their feedback primes and modifies their mindsets and academic motivation. Person-focused praise reflects a fixed mindset and negative academic motivation (i.e., avoidance), whereas process-focused praise undermines negative academic motivation. The pupils in the two samples had growth mindsets. However, the Finnish students preferred to bestow neutral praise and to be more negative with regard to their academic motivation whereas the Chinese students favored process- and person-focused praise, the former reflecting not only their growth mindset but also their positive academic motivation (i.e., trying).

Keywords: China; Finland; academic motivation; culture; feedback; mindset.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The Chinese mediational model: Praise – Mindset – Academic motivation. p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The thicker lines in the measurement model represent factor loadings > 0.7, the narrower lines < 0.7.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The Finnish mediational model: Praise – Mindset – Academic motivation. p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The thicker lines in the measurement model represent factor loadings > 0.7, the narrower lines < 0.7.

References

    1. Aronson J., Fried C. B., Good C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38 113–125. 10.1006/jesp.2001.1491 - DOI
    1. Blackwell L. S., Trzesniewski K. H., Dweck C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Dev. 78 246–263. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brummelman E., Nelemans S. A., Thomaes S., Orobio de Castro B. (2017). When parents’ praise inflates, children’s self-esteem deflates. Child Dev. 88 1799–1809. 10.1111/cdev.12936 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brummelman E., Thomaes S., Orobio de Castro B., Overbeek G., Bushman B. J. (2014). ‘That’s not just beautiful—That’s incredibly beautiful!’ The adverse impact of inflated praise on children with low self-esteem. Psychol. Sci. 25 728–735. 10.1177/0956797613514251 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butler R. (1986). The role of generalised expectancies in determining causal attributions for success and failure in two social classes. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 56 51–63. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1986.tb02645.x - DOI

LinkOut - more resources