Comparison of suture-button and screw fixation in the treatment of ankle syndesmotic injuries: Cohort study protocol
- PMID: 32769937
- PMCID: PMC7592993
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021679
Comparison of suture-button and screw fixation in the treatment of ankle syndesmotic injuries: Cohort study protocol
Expression of concern in
-
Expression of Concern: Study Protocols.Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Nov 7;104(45):e46330. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000046330. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025. PMID: 41204616 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Syndesmotic injuries account for a significant number of ankle injuries. There is no consensus regarding the recommended method of treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate: METHODS:: This study was performed and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist. The records of 200 patients with ankle fractures who had undergone surgical treatment in our clinics between January 2014 and January 2018 were retrospectively investigated. This retrospective cohort study was approved by the institutional review board in the 2nd Hospital of Jilin University. The primary outcome measure was the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale and the Foot Function Index. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale score, complications, range of movement of ankle, reoperations, and radiologic outcomes. For statistical comparison of the clinical and radiologic findings between the 2 groups, we used SPSS, version 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL), statistical software. P Values of < .05 were considered statistically significant.
Conclusion: The hypothesis was that the SB technique would achieve better functional outcomes as compared to the syndesmotic screw technique after surgery.
Trial registration: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5793).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- Hunt KJ, George E, Harris AH, et al. Epidemiology of syndesmosis injuries in intercollegiate football: incidence and risk factors from National Collegiate Athletic Association injury surveillance system data from 2004-2005 to 2008-2009. Clin J Sport Med 2013;23:278–82. - PubMed
-
- Beumer A, Heijboer RP, Fontijne WP, et al. Late reconstruction of the anterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: good outcome in 9 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:519–21. - PubMed
-
- Grass R, Rammelt S, Biewener A, et al. Peroneus longus ligamentoplasty for chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 2003;24:392–7. - PubMed
-
- Lui TH. Tri-ligamentous reconstruction of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a minimally invasive approach. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010;49:495–500. - PubMed
-
- Morris MW, Rice P, Schneider TE. Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis reconstruction using a free hamstring autograft. Foot Ankle Int 2009;30:506–11. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
