Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Aug 7;10(8):81.
doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00345-8.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: outcomes by disease burden

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: outcomes by disease burden

Daniel J DeAngelo et al. Blood Cancer J. .

Abstract

Adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) have a poor prognosis, especially if disease burden is high. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 INO-VATE trial examined the efficacy and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) vs. standard of care chemotherapy (SC) among R/R ALL patients with low, moderate, or high disease burden, respectively, defined as bone marrow blasts (BMB) < 50% (n = 53 vs. 48), 50-90% (n = 79 vs. 83), and >90% (n = 30 vs. 30). Patients in the InO vs. SC arm with low, moderate, and high BMB%, respectively, had improved rates of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (74% vs. 46% [p = 0.0022], 75 vs. 27% [p < 0.0001], and 70 vs. 17% [p < 0.0001]), and improved overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.64 [p = 0.0260], 0.81 [p = 0.1109], and 0.60 [p = 0.0335]). Irrespective of BMB%, cytopenias were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events, and post-transplant veno-occlusive disease was more common with InO vs. SC. Patients with extramedullary disease or lymphoblastic lymphoma showed similar efficacy and safety outcomes. This favorable benefit-to-risk ratio of InO treatment irrespective of disease burden supports its use in challenging and high disease burden subpopulations. INO-VATE is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov : #NCT01564784.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D.J.D. declares honoraria from Pfizer. A.S.A. declares consulting fees and honoraria from Pfizer, research funding from Amgen and AbbVie, and honoraria from Kite Pharma. D.I.M. declares consultancy with Pfizer, Amgen, and Novartis. M.S. declares research support and honoraria from Pfizer. M.L. declares honoraria from Pfizer. W.S. declares honoraria from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. N.G. declares research support and honoraria from Amgen and Pfizer. E.J. has received research grants and consultancy fees from Amgen, Pfizer, Takeda, Adaptive Biotechnologies, AbbVie, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. A.M. has received research support from Pfizer. T.W., E.V., and A.N. are employees of and own stock in Pfizer. H.K. declares honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImmunoGen, and Pfizer. S.O. declares research support and honoraria from Pfizer.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Progression-free survival by bone marrow status.
Kaplan–Meier plots show progression-free survival by baseline bone marrow blasts (<50%, 50–90%, and >90%) for patients in the (a) InO arm and (b) SC arm. BMB bone marrow blasts, InO inotuzumab ozogamicin, PFS progression-free survival, SC standard of care chemotherapy.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Overall survival by bone marrow status.
Kaplan–Meier plots show overall survival by baseline bone marrow blasts (<50%, 50–90%, and >90%) for patients in the (a) InO arm and (b) SC arm. BMB bone marrow blasts, InO inotuzumab ozogamicin, OS overall survival, SC standard of care chemotherapy.

References

    1. Gokbuget N, et al. Outcome of relapsed adult lymphoblastic leukemia depends on response to salvage chemotherapy, prognostic factors, and performance of stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;120:2032–2041. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-399287. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oriol A, et al. Outcome after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adult patients included in four consecutive risk-adapted trials by the PETHEMA Study Group. Haematologica. 2010;95:589–596. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.014274. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tavernier E, et al. Outcome of treatment after first relapse in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia initially treated by the LALA-94 trial. Leukemia. 2007;21:1907–1914. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404824. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Brien S, et al. Outcome of adults with acute lymphocytic leukemia after second salvage therapy. Cancer. 2008;113:3186–3191. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23919. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topp MS, et al. Safety and activity of blinatumomab for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:57–66. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71170-2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data