Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;48(12):1230-1236.
doi: 10.1002/dc.24553. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology

Fatima Zahra Aly  1 , Sayedamin Mostofizadeh  1 , Salmaan Jawaid  2 , Jacquelyn Knapik  1 , Faisal Mukhtar  1 , Robert Klein  3
Affiliations

Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology

Fatima Zahra Aly et al. Diagn Cytopathol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: This is the first study to evaluate the accuracy of bile duct brushings since the introduction of single operator cholangioscopy SpyGlass DS system in 2015. The primary aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of cytology brushings against biopsies obtained at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and cholangioscopy.

Method: A retrospective search for bile duct brushing specimens was performed and the charts reviewed. The gold standard for definitive diagnosis of malignancy was surgical tissue or compelling clinical evidence of malignancy. Definite negative diagnosis relied on lack of clinical/imaging features of malignancy on follow-up.

Results: There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of cytology specimens obtained at different procedures. Overall sensitivity for all methods was 59%, specificity 90% and accuracy of 82%. Notably, all four false-positive cases except for one were from patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or primary biliary sclerosis. There was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity between biopsies procured by the two methods. The combined biopsy sensitivity for all modalities was 44% with a specificity of 100%. There was 70% concordance between cytology and biopsy cases. The overall specificity and sensitivity of the combined cytology and biopsy result was 85% and 65.3%, respectively. Ranking of factors that predict clinical diagnosis shows cytology results to surpass other parameters including pancreatic mass, age and stenosis length. Similarly, the presence of two cell populations and three-dimensional clusters was not nearly as predictive of malignancy as single malignant cells.

Conclusion: Biliary brush cytology specimens performed better than biopsies irrespective of whether they are procured during ERCP or cholangioscopy. The combination of cytology and biopsy had the best accuracy than either one alone.

Keywords: bile duct cytology; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); sensitivity; single operator cholangioscopy; specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Chadwick BE, Layfield LJ, Witt BL, Schmidt RL, Cox RN, Adler DG. Significance of atypia in pancreatic and bile duct brushings: follow-up analysis of the categories atypical and suspicious for malignancy. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42(4):285-291.
    1. Sachdev A, Duseja A, Bhalla A, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic wire guided biliary brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures. Trop Gastroenterol. 2003;24(4):215-217.
    1. Logrono R, Kurtycz DF, Molina CP, Trivedi VA, Wong JY, Block KP. Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: the experience at 2 university hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(3):387-392.
    1. Mehmood S, Loya A, Yusuf MA. Biliary brush cytology revisited. Acta Cytol. 2016;60(2):167-172.
    1. Mahmoudi N, Enns R, Amar J, AlAli J, Lam E, Telford J. Biliary brush cytology: factors associated with positive yields on biliary brush cytology. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(4):569-573.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources