Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jan 10:104:110062.
doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110062. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

Psychological effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in health professionals: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Psychological effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in health professionals: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Raimundo Monteiro da Silva Neto et al. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Psychological suffering by health professionals may be associated with the uncertainty of a safe workplace. Front-line professionals exposed and involved in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 patients are more susceptible.

Method: This review was conducted based on papers that were published at MEDLINE, BMJ, PsycINFO, and LILACS, the according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA).

Results: Health professionals had a higher level of anxiety (13.0 vs. 8.5%, p < 0.01, OR = 1.6152; 95%CI 1.3283 to 1.9641; p < 0.0001) and depression 12.2 vs. 9.5%; p = 0.04; OR = 1.3246; 95%CI 1.0930 to 1.6053; p = 0.0042), besides somatizations and insomnia compared to professionals from other areas.

Conclusion: Health professionals, regardless of their age, showed significant levels of mental disorders. We observed a prevalence of anxiety and depression. Insomnia was a risk factor for both.

Keywords: COVID-19; Mental health; Psychological suffering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Funnel plot of studies that assessed anxiety and depression in health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic (risk of bias).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Odds Ratio of two studies that assessed anxiety and depression in professionals working during the COVID-19pandemic.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flowchart describing the search strategy and selection of studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Meta-analysis of anxiety in health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Meta-analysis of depression in health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Meta-analysis of anxiety in health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Meta-analysis of non-depression in health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed S.F., Quadeer A.A., McKay M.R. Preliminary identification of potential vaccine targets for the COVID19 coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) based on SARS-CoV immunological studies. Viruses. 2020;12-254 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blakey S.M., Kirby A.C., McClure K.E., Elbogen E.B., Beckham J.C., Watkins L.L., Clapp J.D. Posttraumatic safety behaviors: characteristics and associations with symptom severity in two samples. Traumatology. 2019;26:74–83. doi: 10.1037/trm0000205. - DOI
    1. Corona Vírus Diagnostipedia Reported Cases of Corona Virus in the World in Real Time. 2020. www.coronavirus.diagnostipedia.com/ http:
    1. Gardner P.J., Moallef P. Psychological impact on SARS survivors: critical review of the English language literature. Canadian Psychol. Psychol. Can. 2015;56:123–135.
    1. Guangming Pequim, Grupo Diretor Central Mais de 3.000 Equipes Médicas em Hubei Foram Infectadas no Estágio Inicial da Epidemia, Atualmente não há Relatos de Infecção Entre as Equipes de Assistência Médica. 2020. https://politics.gmw.cn/2020-03/06/content_33626862.htm