Experiences of Using Cochrane Systematic Reviews by Local HTA Units
- PMID: 32772006
- PMCID: PMC9278610
- DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.133
Experiences of Using Cochrane Systematic Reviews by Local HTA Units
Abstract
This study evaluated the use of Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) by Quebec's local health technology assessment (HTA) units to promote efficiency in hospital decision-making. An online survey was conducted to examine: Characteristics of the HTA units; Knowledge about works and services from the Cochrane Collaboration; Level of satisfaction about the use of CSRs; Facilitating factors and barriers to the implementation of CSRs evidence in a local context; Suggestions to improve the use of CSRs. Data accuracy was checked by 2 independent evaluators. Ten HTA units participated. From their implementation a total of 321 HTA reports were published (49.8% included a SR). Works and services provided by the Cochrane collaboration were very well-known and HTA units were highly satisfied with CSRs (80%-100%). As regards to applicability in HTA and use of CSRs, major strengths were as follow: Useful as resource for search terms and background material; May reduce the workload (eg, brief review instead of full SR); Use to update a current review. Major weaknesses were: Limited use since no CSRs were available for many HTA projects; Difficulty to apply findings to local context; Focused only on efficacy and innocuity; Cannot be used as a substitute to a full HTA report. This study provided a unique context of assessment with a familiar group of producers, users and disseminators of CSRs in hospital setting. Since they generally used other articles from the literature or produce an original SR in complement with CSRs, this led to suggestions to improve their use of CSRs. However, the main limit for the use of CRS in local HTA will remain its lack of contextualisation. As such, this study reinforces the need to consider the notion of complementarity of experimental data informing us about causality and contextual data, allowing decision-making adapted to local issues.
Keywords: Cochrane Systematic Review; Health Technology Assessment; Hospital; Quebec; Systematic Review.
© 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 May 8;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0498-6. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018. PMID: 29739352 Free PMC article.
-
Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level.BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Mar 27;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-54. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009. PMID: 19327160 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge mobilization in the context of health technology assessment: an exploratory case study.Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Apr 3;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-10. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012. PMID: 22472141 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The use of clinical study reports to enhance the quality of systematic reviews: a survey of systematic review authors.Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 8;7(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0766-x. Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30089508 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The effectiveness and acceptability of evidence synthesis summary formats for clinical guideline development groups: a mixed-methods systematic review.Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 27;17(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01243-2. Implement Sci. 2022. PMID: 36303142 Free PMC article.
-
Production and use of rapid responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec (Canada): perspectives from evidence synthesis producers and decision makers.Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Feb 13;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01105-x. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024. PMID: 38351054 Free PMC article.
References
-
- About Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Library website. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/about/about-cochrane-reviews. Accessed November 15, 2018.
-
- Green S, Higgins J, Alderson P, Clarke M, Mulrow C, Oxman A. Chapter 1: Introduction. In: Higgins J, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. West Sussex, England: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley; 2008.
-
- Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. Knowledge synthesis. In: Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID, eds. Knowledge Translation in Health Care. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013:29-49. doi:10.1002/9781118413555.ch04
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials