Alternative mydriasis techniques for retinopathy of prematurity screening
- PMID: 32772218
- DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01542-x
Alternative mydriasis techniques for retinopathy of prematurity screening
Abstract
Purpose: There is a large variation in mydriatic regimens used in screening for retinopathy in preterm infants. Except for the standard instillation of mydriatic drops in their commercial formulation, other techniques for pupil dilation have also been described. This study aimed to review all techniques that have been used for mydriasis in retinopathy of prematurity eye examination (ROPEE) screening.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library, Trip database, and Scopus, using the key words: "mydriasis", "techniques", "mydriatics", "dilating drops", "retinopathy of prematurity", "ROP", "phenylephrine", "cyclopentolate", "tropicamide", "smaller mydriatic drops", "reduction in drop size" to February 2019.
Results: Five primary studies were included, assessing the techniques of microdrops, lower conjunctival fornix (LCF) packing and Mydriasert® ophthalmic insert. Reported efficacy was similar to commercial eyedrops instillation. Microdrops appeared to have a superior safety profile. LCF packing and Mydriasert lead to increased blood pressure, without serious complications, necessitating further safety studies.
Conclusions: Of all alternative mydriasis techniques for ROPEE screening that have been described, microdrops appear to be the safest yet still effective technique in the fragile population of premature infants in risk of ROP.
Keywords: Dilation; Mydriasis; Mydriatics; Preterm infants; Retinopathy of prematurity.
References
-
- Kremer LJ, Reith DM, Medlicott N, Broadbent R (2019) Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants. BMJ Paediatr Open 3(1):e000448. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000448 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al (2011) The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M et al (2014) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Health Research Institute Web site. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp . Accessed 20 Aug 2019
-
- Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Son F et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(27):1–173. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta7270 - DOI
-
- Lynch MG, Brown RH, Goode SM, Schoenwald RD, Chien S (1987) Reduction of phenylephrine drop size in infants achieves equal dilation with decreased systemic absorption. Arch Ophthalmol 105(10):1364–1365. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1987.01060100066027 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
