The technical reasoning hypothesis does not rule out the potential key roles of imitation and working memory for CTC
- PMID: 32772970
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X20000047
The technical reasoning hypothesis does not rule out the potential key roles of imitation and working memory for CTC
Abstract
To support their claim for technical reasoning skills rather than imitation as the key for cumulative technological culture (CTC), Osiurak and Reynaud argue that chimpanzees can imitate mechanical actions, but do not have CTC. They also state that an increase in working memory in human evolution could not have been a key driver of CTC. We discuss why we disagree with these claims.
Comment in
-
The elephant in the China shop: When technical reasoning meets cumulative technological culture.Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 10;43:e183. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20000291. Behav Brain Sci. 2020. PMID: 32772979
Comment on
-
The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture.Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Nov 19;43:e156. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19003236. Behav Brain Sci. 2019. PMID: 31739823
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources