The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: a clinical review
- PMID: 32774442
- PMCID: PMC7409631
- DOI: 10.1186/s12991-020-00293-4
The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: a clinical review
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process in which the doctor provides clear and complete medical information to patients about their treatment, and patients provide information on his/her preferences. Patients and clinicians bring different, but equally important, knowledge to the decision-making process. Through the adoption of SDM, it should be possible to overcome the barriers that hinder the acceptance of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) by patients, and often also by psychiatrists. The present paper is a critical appraisal of recent literature on the impact of SDM in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments and in implementing the use of LAIs in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. SDM is recognized as a promising strategy to improve collaboration between clinicians and patients in achieving recovery. When considering drug treatments, clinicians must evaluate the patient's preferences, expectations and concerns towards the development of a personalized treatment strategy. Moreover, an active involvement in the decision process could reduce the patient's perception of being coerced into the use of LAIs. Involving patients in the choice of therapy is not sufficient to increase pharmacological adherence if, at the same time, there is no constant work of comparison and communication with the reference psychiatric team. SDM can be particularly effective for LAI prescription, since patient can have prejudices and unjustified fears related to the LAI formulation, which the doctor must resolve.
Keywords: Adherence; Empowerment; Long-acting injectable antipsychotics; Recovery; Schizophrenia; Shared decision-making.
© The Author(s) 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsNone of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript.
References
-
- Tiffen J, Corbridge S, Slimmer L. Enhancing clinical decision making: development of a contiguous definition and conceptual framework. J Prof Nurs. 2014;30(5):399–405. - PubMed
-
- Luciano M, Sampogna G, Del Vecchio V, Loos S, Slade M, Clarke E, Nagy M, Kovacs A, Munk-Jørgensen P, Krogsgaard Bording M, Kawohl W, Rössler W, Puschner B, Fiorillo A, CEDAR Study Group When does shared decision making is adopted in psychiatric clinical practice? Results from a European multicentric study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01031-y. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
