Biomarker analysis to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer: An exploratory biomarker study of COMPASS, a randomized phase II trial
- PMID: 32774771
- PMCID: PMC7392622
- DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27658
Biomarker analysis to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer: An exploratory biomarker study of COMPASS, a randomized phase II trial
Abstract
Background: The findings of COMPASS, a randomized phase II study, suggested that the regimens and courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) did not affect the pathological response. However, pathological complete response was achieved in 10% patients who received four courses of either S-1/cisplatin or paclitaxel/cisplatin. We hypothesized that if relevant biomarkers could be used to predict the suitable NAC regimen before treatment initiation, further improvements could be ensured in the outcomes of locally advanced GC.
Materials and methods: mRNA extraction, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and immunohistochemical analyses were performed using endoscopic biopsy specimens of primary tumors, collected prior to NAC, to determine the clinically relevant biomarkers.
Results: TIMP1, DSG2, RRM1, MUC2, EGFR, ZDHHC14, and CLDN18.2 were identified as biomarker candidates, since their expression was significantly associated with the pathological responses to each NAC regimen. Furthermore, TIMP1 and DSG2 were identified as predictive biomarkers of the pathological response to each NAC regimen.
Conclusions: The effective prediction of the pathological response to NAC regimens in locally advanced GC using biomarkers identified from endoscopic biopsy specimens indicates the possibility of personalizing NAC based on biomarker analysis.
Keywords: gastric cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathological response; personalized therapy; predictive biomarkers.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST TO: Research Funding: Taiho pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Chugai pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Ono pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiitisankyo pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd, and Eli Lilly Japan K. K. Lecture fees: Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd, Ono pharmaceutical Co.Ltd and Bristol-Myers Squibb K. K. Speaker Bureau: Taiho pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Chugai pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Ono pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Bristol-Myers Squibb K. K and Eli Lilly Japan K. K. These are unrelated to the submitted work. TY: Lecture fees from: MSD, ONO, BMS, Taiho, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lilly, Johnson and Johnson, Covidien, and Olympus. Personal grant from Lilly. These are unrelated to the submitted work. YM: Lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Taiho, Chugai, and Daiichi-Sankyo. Consigned research fund from Toso company, Limited, Japan. These are unrelated to the submitted work. YR: Speaker Bureau from; Daiichi-Sankyo, Johnson and Johnson, Otsuka, Lilly, Taiho pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb. Research Funding: Taiho pharmaceutical, Abbott, Asahi Kasei, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tsumura & Co., Covidien, Zeria pharmaceutical, Otsuka, EA Pharma, Johnson and Johnson. These are unrelated to the submitted work. MM: Research Funding from Chugai pharmaceutical, Teijin pharmaceutical, Daiitisankyo pharmaceutical, Takeda pharmaceutical, Terumo Co.Ltd., Japan Lifeline Co.Ltd, Senko Co.Ltd. These are unrelated to the submitted work. The other co-authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this work. KY: Speaker Bureau from; Bristol-Myers Squibb K. K., Chugai pharmaceutical, EA Pharma, Eli Lilly Japan K. K., Ono pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Taiho pharmaceutical Co. and Yakult. These are unrelated to the submitted work.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Biomarker Study for Selecting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Based on Prognostic Prediction Using Gastric Cancer Biopsy Specimens from a Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial.Anticancer Res. 2024 Nov;44(11):4951-4960. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.17320. Anticancer Res. 2024. PMID: 39477312 Clinical Trial.
-
Induction of a pathological complete response by four courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: early results of the randomized phase II COMPASS trial.Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;21(1):213-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3055-x. Epub 2013 Jul 10. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 23838904 Clinical Trial.
-
Digital histopathological images of biopsy predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.Gastric Cancer. 2023 Sep;26(5):734-742. doi: 10.1007/s10120-023-01407-z. Epub 2023 Jun 15. Gastric Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37322381
-
Refining the Performance of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Post-neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Pathologically Proven Pre-treatment Node-positive Breast Cancer: An Update for Clinical Practice.Anticancer Res. 2016 Apr;36(4):1461-71. Anticancer Res. 2016. PMID: 27069121 Review.
-
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Is it a must or a fake?World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 14;24(2):274-289. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i2.274. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29375213 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Increased CD4/CD8 Lymphocyte ratio predicts favourable neoadjuvant treatment response in gastric cancer: A prospective pilot study.World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Feb 15;15(2):303-317. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i2.303. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36908322 Free PMC article.
-
Desmoglein-2 as a cancer modulator: friend or foe?Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 22;13:1327478. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1327478. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 38188287 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gastric cancer biomarker analysis in patients treated with different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens within SAMIT, a phase III randomized controlled trial.Sci Rep. 2022 May 20;12(1):8509. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12439-3. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35595817 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Multisite verification of the accuracy of a multi-gene next generation sequencing panel for detection of mutations and copy number alterations in solid tumours.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 1;16(10):e0258188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258188. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34597339 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, Furukawa H, Nakajima T, Ohashi Y, Imamura H, Higashino M, Yamamura Y, Kurita A, et al.; ACTS-GC Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357:1810–1820. 10.1056/NEJMoa072252. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Chung HC, Park YK, Lee KH, Lee KW, Kim YH, Noh SI, Cho JY, Mok YJ, Kim YH, Ji J, et al.. CLASSIC trial investigators. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 379:315–321. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61873-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yoshida K, Kodera Y, Kochi M, Ichikawa W, Kakeji Y, Sano T, Nagao N, Takahashi M, Takagane A, Watanabe T, Kaji M, Okitsu H, Nomura T, et al.. Addition of Docetaxel to Oral Fluoropyrimidine Improves Efficacy in Patients With Stage III Gastric Cancer: Interim Analysis of JACCRO GC-07, a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37:1296–1304. 10.1200/JCO.18.01138. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, Smith DB, Langley RE, Verma M, et al.; MAGIC Trial Participants. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:11–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa055531. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous