Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;9(3):840-843.
doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.03.39.

Current status of robotic adrenalectomy in the United States

Affiliations
Review

Current status of robotic adrenalectomy in the United States

Raymon H Grogan. Gland Surg. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Since its introduction more than 30 years ago, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the gold standard approach to adrenal surgery for the majority of adrenal pathology. It has been shown to have superior clinical benefits to open adrenalectomy for the majority of cases of adrenal surgery. Robot-assisted adrenalectomy has also been shown to be a reasonable alternative approach to adrenal gland resection. Even though robot-assisted adrenalectomy has been performed in the United States for more than 20 years, it has yet to become the gold-standard for this operation, evidenced by the fact that in the United States laparoscopic adrenalectomy remains more common than robot-assisted adrenalectomy. Market factors, clinical factors and surgeon factors all play a role in the spread and adoption of robotic surgery in general. Here we review the most up to date literature on the state of robotic adrenalectomy in the United States, and explore some of the factors that may be influencing the rate of adoption of robotic adrenalectomy in the United States.

Keywords: Robotic adrenalectomy; laparoscopic adrenalectomy; robotic adrenalectomy trends; trends in robotic surgery, trends in adrenal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The author has completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs.2020.03.39). The series “Robotic Adrenalectomy” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The author has no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Temporal Trends in the Proportional Use of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Surgery. Data are from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative from January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2018 (7). These data reflect practices at all hospitals included in the study.

References

    1. Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolté E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing's syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1033. 10.1056/NEJM199210013271417 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sardi A, McKinnon W. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism. JAMA 1993;269:989-90. 10.1001/jama.1993.03500080037023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith CD, Weber CJ, Amerson JR. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: new gold standard. World J Surg 1999;23:389-96. 10.1007/PL00012314 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guidelines for the Minimally Invasive Treatment of Adrenal Pathology - A SAGES Publication [Internet]. [cited 2020 Feb 19]. Available online: https://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/guidelines-for-the-minimal...
    1. Horgan S, Vanuno D. Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001;11:415-9. 10.1089/10926420152761950 - DOI - PubMed