Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520945506.
doi: 10.1177/0300060520945506.

Clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with acute and subacute type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Affiliations

Clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with acute and subacute type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Yonghua Bi et al. J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is considered the mini-invasive treatment of choice for patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients with acute and subacute TBAD after TEVAR.

Methods: From January 2014 until July 2016, 22 acute patients (Group A) and 18 subacute patients received TEVAR (Group B), and 13 patients were managed non-operatively (Group C). The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 was used to assess QoL preoperatively and after TEVAR. Operative techniques and complications were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: The role emotion, vitality, and mental health domains scored well preoperatively. Except for role emotion, vitality, and mental health, the remaining domains significantly improved after TEVAR. There was no significant difference in QoL metrics between Groups A and B. In Group C, bodily pain and social functioning domains were improved, and role emotion was decreased, with no improvement in the remaining domains. The 3-year survival rates were 95.5%, 100%, and 85.7% for Groups A, B, and C, respectively.

Conclusions: TEVAR may be safe and effective in patients with acute and subacute TBAD with similar and favorable clinical and QoL metrics.

Keywords: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36; Stanford type B aortic dissection; chest pain; quality of life; stent; thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distributions of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 domain scores before repair and during follow-up.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jarral OA, Kidher E, Patel VM, et al. Quality of life after intervention on the thoracic aorta. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49: 369–389. - PubMed
    1. Endlich M, Hamiko M, Gestrich C, et al. Long-term outcome and quality of life in aortic type A dissection survivors. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 64: 91–99. - PubMed
    1. Santini F, Montalbano G, Messina A, et al. Survival and quality of life after repair of acute type A aortic dissection in patients aged 75 years and older justify intervention. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29: 386–391. - PubMed
    1. Asaloumidis N, Karkos C, Trellopoulos G, et al. Mid-term outcomes and aortic remodelling after thoracic endovascular repair for acute, subacute, and chronic aortic dissection: the VIRTUE Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 48: 363–371. - PubMed
    1. Asaloumidis N, Karkos CD, Trellopoulos G, et al. Outcome after endovascular repair of subacute type B aortic dissection: a combined series from two Greek centers. Ann Vasc Surg 2017; 42: 136–142. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources