Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Aug 10:21:e924894.
doi: 10.12659/AJCR.924894.

Spontaneous Rupture in a Non-Laboring Uterus at 20 Weeks: A Case Report

Affiliations
Case Reports

Spontaneous Rupture in a Non-Laboring Uterus at 20 Weeks: A Case Report

Noorkardiffa Syawalina Omar et al. Am J Case Rep. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND Uterine rupture is uncommon but when it happens, it can cause significant morbidity and mortality to both mother and fetus. Incidence reportedly is higher in scarred than in unscarred uteri. Most cases occur in laboring women in their third trimester with a previous history of uterine surgery, such as caesarean delivery or myomectomy. We present a case of spontaneous uterine rupture in a non-laboring uterus in the mid-trimester of pregnancy. CASE REPORT The patient presented with threatened miscarriage at 17 weeks' gestation and ultrasound findings were that raised suspicion of a morbidly adherent placenta. Her history was significant for two previous cesarean deliveries more than 5 years ago followed by two spontaneous complete miscarriages in the first trimester. The patient was managed conservatively until 20 weeks' gestation, when she presented with acute abdomen with hypotensive shock. Her hemoglobin dropped to a level such that she required blood transfusion. An emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed, which revealed a 5-cm rupture in the lower part of the anterior wall of the uterus, out of which there was extrusion of part of the placenta. Given the patient's massive bleeding, the decision was made to proceed with subtotal hysterectomy. Histopathology of the specimen confirmed the diagnosis of placenta percreta. CONCLUSIONS Identification of uterine scarring with morbidly adherent placenta is crucial because even in early pregnancy, it can lead to uterine rupture. Furthermore, failure to recognize and promptly manage uterine rupture may prove fatal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Post subtotal hysterectomy specimen showing uterine rupture with intact amniotic sac and fetus in situ.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Stillbirth protruding out after iatrogenic rupture of the amniotic sac.

Similar articles

References

    1. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, et al. Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: A nationwide population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2009;116(8):1069–78. ; discussion 1078–80. - PubMed
    1. Singh A, Shrivastava C. Uterine eupture: Still a harsh reality! J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015;65(3):158–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peker N, Aydin E, Evsen MS, et al. Unscarred uterine rupture and subsequent pregnancy outcome – a tertiary centre experience. Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(2):95–90. - PubMed
    1. Kaczmarczyk M, Sparen P, Terry P, Cnattingius S. Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: A population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. BJOG. 2007;114(10):1208–14. - PubMed
    1. Kim HS, Oh SY, Choi SJ, et al. Uterine rupture in pregnancies following myomectomy: A multicenter case series. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016;59(6):454–62. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types