Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jan 2;30(1):198-202.
doi: 10.1080/09273948.2020.1774906. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

Comparison of CD4 Counts with Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Methotrexate from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) Uveitis Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of CD4 Counts with Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Methotrexate from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) Uveitis Trial

Christina L Kong et al. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. .

Abstract

Purpose: Sub-analysis of the FAST Trial comparing change in CD4 (∆CD4) from baseline through 12 months in uveitis patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and methotrexate (MTX).

Methods: Patients were randomly allocated to 1.5 g twice daily MMF or 25 mg weekly MTX. Individuals with CD4 counts at baseline, 6 months (or treatment failure prior), and 12 months (or treatment failure between 6 and 12 months) were included. The association between treatment and ∆CD4 (cells/μL) was analyzed using multivariable linear regression.

Results: There was no significant difference in ∆CD4 between MMF and MTX at 6 months (-31.7 cells/μL for MMF compared to MTX; 95% CI: -358.2 to 294.8, P = .85) and 12 months (-78.3 cells/μL for MMF compared to MTX; 95% CI: -468.0 to 311.3; P = .69).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in ∆CD4 between MMF and MTX from baseline to 12 months, suggesting that MMF does not confer additional risk of CD4 lymphopenia in uveitic patients.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01829295.

Keywords: CD4; antimetabolite; methotrexate; mycophenolate mofetil; uveitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. This study was funded by the National Eye Institute (NEI) (grant U10 EY021125).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of the change in CD4+ T-cell count from baseline to the primary endpoint by treatment group

References

    1. Mok CC. Mycophenolate mofetil for lupus nephritis: An update. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11(12):1353–1364. doi:10.1586/1744666X.2015.1087314 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamzeh N, Voelker A, Forssén A, et al. Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in sarcoidosis. Respir Med 2014;108(11):1663–1669. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2014.09.013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tian H, Cronstein BN. Understanding the mechanisms of action of methotrexate: Implications for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007;65(3):168–173. - PubMed
    1. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(1):1–26. doi:10.1002/acr.22783 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Szalay B, Vásárhelyi B, Cseh Á, et al. The impact of conventional DMARD and biological therapies on CD4+ cell subsets in rheumatoid arthritis: A follow-up study. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(2):175–185. doi:10.1007/s10067-013-2352-x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data