Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e209271.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9271.

Derivation and Validation of Novel Phenotypes of Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Critically Ill Children

Affiliations

Derivation and Validation of Novel Phenotypes of Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Critically Ill Children

L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is a dynamic and heterogeneous process associated with high morbidity and mortality in critically ill children.

Objective: To determine whether data-driven phenotypes of MODS based on the trajectories of 6 organ dysfunctions have prognostic and therapeutic relevance in critically ill children.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included 20 827 pediatric intensive care encounters among 14 285 children admitted to 2 large academic pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) between January 2010 and August 2016. Patients were excluded if they were older than 21 years or had undergone cardiac surgery. The 6 subscores of the pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score were calculated for the first 3 days, including the subscores for respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, hepatic, neurologic, and renal dysfunctions. MODS was defined as a pSOFA subscore of at least 2 in at least 2 organs. Encounters were split in a 80:20 ratio for derivation and validation, respectively. The trajectories of the 6 subscores were used to derive a set of data-driven phenotypes of MODS using subgraph-augmented nonnegative matrix factorization in the derivation set. Data analysis was conducted from March to October 2019.

Exposures: The primary exposure was phenotype membership. In the subset of patients with vasoactive-dependent shock, the interaction between hydrocortisone and phenotype membership and its association with outcomes were examined in a matched cohort.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included persistent MODS on day 7, and vasoactive-free, ventilator-free, and hospital-free days. Regression analysis was used to adjust for age, severity of illness, immunocompromised status, and study site.

Results: There were 14 285 patients with 20 827 encounters (median [interquartile range] age 5.2 years [1.5-12.7] years; 11 409 [54.8%; 95% CI, 54.1%-55.5%] male patients). Of these, 5297 encounters (25.4%; 95% CI, 24.8%-26.0%) were with patients who had MODS, of which 5054 (95.4%) met the subgraph count threshold and were included in the analysis. Subgraph augmented nonnegative matrix factorization uncovered 4 data-driven phenotypes of MODS, characterized by a combination of neurologic, respiratory, coagulation, and cardiovascular dysfunction, as follows: phenotype 1, severe, persistent encephalopathy (1019 patients [19.2%]); phenotype 2, moderate, resolving hypoxemia (1828 patients [34.5%]); phenotype 3, severe, persistent hypoxemia and shock (1012 patients [19.1%]); and phenotype 4, moderate, persistent thrombocytopenia and shock (1195 patients [22.6%]). These phenotypes were reproducible in a validation set of encounters, had distinct clinical characteristics, and were independently associated with outcomes. For example, using phenotype 2 as reference, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for death by 28 days were as follows: phenotype 1, aHR of 3.0 (IQR, 2.1-4.3); phenotype 3, aHR of 2.8 (IQR, 2.0-4.1); and phenotype 4, aHR of 1.8 (IQR, 1.2-2.6). Interaction analysis in a matched cohort of patients with vasoactive-dependent shock revealed that hydrocortisone had differential treatment association with vasoactive-free days across phenotypes. For example, patients in phenotype 3 who received hydrocortisone had more vasoactive-free days than those who did not (23 days vs 18 days; P for interaction < .001), whereas patients in other phenotypes who received hydrocortisone either had no difference or had less vasoactive-free days.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, data-driven phenotyping in critically ill children with MODS uncovered 4 distinct and reproducible phenotypes with prognostic relevance and possible therapeutic relevance. Further validation and characterization of these phenotypes is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Data-Driven Phenotyping Using Subgraph Augmented Nonnegative Matrix Factorization
Subgraph mining extracts representative subgraphs from the trajectories of the 6 pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment subscores in patients with MODS, which results in a matrix, M, of patient-subgraph counts. Nonnegative matrix factorization is used to derive a matrix, F, of hidden features (in this case the phenotypes), and a matrix of mixture coefficient C with the coefficients that compose the subgraph-based phenotypes. The factorization is done by iteratively updating F and C using the sparse nonnegative matrix factorization with sparseness in the left factor algorithm to gradually reduce the error between M and F × C. Once the nonnegative matrix factorization is completed, the final phenotypes can be characterized given the highly interpretable nature of the algorithm. Of note, the size of the matrices, number of groups, and the phenotype characterization examples here are used for illustration purposes only. CV indicates cardiovascular; resp, respiratory.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Common Subgraphs in Each of the 4 Data-Driven MODS Phenotypes
The most common subgraphs in each phenotype and the proportion of patients who had each of them.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tamburro RF, Jenkins TL. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: a challenge for the pediatric critical care community. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(3_suppl)(suppl 1):S1-S3. - PubMed
    1. Matics TJ, Pinto NP, Sanchez-Pinto LN. Association of organ dysfunction scores and functional outcomes following pediatric critical illness. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(8):722-727. doi:10.1097/PCC.0000000000001999 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leteurtre S, Duhamel A, Salleron J, Grandbastien B, Lacroix J, Leclerc F; Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d’Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) . PELOD-2: an update of the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(7):1761-1773. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a2bbd - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin JC, Spinella PC, Fitzgerald JC, et al. ; Sepsis Prevalence, Outcomes, and Therapy Study Investigators . New or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in pediatric severe sepsis: a sepsis phenotype with higher morbidity and mortality. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(1):8-16. doi:10.1097/PCC.0000000000000978 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leteurtre S, Duhamel A, Deken V, Lacroix J, Leclerc F; Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques . Daily estimation of the severity of organ dysfunctions in critically ill children by using the PELOD-2 score. Crit Care. 2015;19:324. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1054-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types