Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug 12;287(1932):20201039.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1039. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

Emerging infectious disease and the challenges of social distancing in human and non-human animals

Affiliations
Review

Emerging infectious disease and the challenges of social distancing in human and non-human animals

Andrea K Townsend et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The 'social distancing' that occurred in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in humans provides a powerful illustration of the intimate relationship between infectious disease and social behaviour in animals. Indeed, directly transmitted pathogens have long been considered a major cost of group living in humans and other social animals, as well as a driver of the evolution of group size and social behaviour. As the risk and frequency of emerging infectious diseases rise, the ability of social taxa to respond appropriately to changing infectious disease pressures could mean the difference between persistence and extinction. Here, we examine changes in the social behaviour of humans and wildlife in response to infectious diseases and compare these responses to theoretical expectations. We consider constraints on altering social behaviour in the face of emerging diseases, including the lack of behavioural plasticity, environmental limitations and conflicting pressures from the many benefits of group living. We also explore the ways that social animals can minimize the costs of disease-induced changes to sociality and the unique advantages that humans may have in maintaining the benefits of sociality despite social distancing.

Keywords: behavioural immunity; pathogens and extinction risk; social distancing; social media; sociality; virtual communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Potential changes in the degree of host sociality in response to EIDs, along with putative mechanisms driving the change and examples. Examples are referred to by letter and explained further in the text. Citations for each example given in parentheses
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Social distancing in response to disease (a) can result in severe costs for social animals. (b) Behavioural adaptations such as risk-sensitive social distancing and the maintenance of some social connections could mitigate these costs. (c) Humans have numerous potential advantages for implementing risk-sensitive social distancing and mitigating the costs of social isolation. (Online version in colour.)

References

    1. Hassell JM, Begon M, Ward MJ, Fevre EM. 2017. Urbanization and disease emergence: dynamics at the wildlife-livestock-human interface. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 55–67. (10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.012) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harper K, Armelagos G. 2010. The changing disease-scape in the third epidemiological transition. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 7, 675–697. (10.3390/ijerph7020675) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiss RA, McMichael AJ. 2004. Social and environmental risk factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. Nat. Med. 10, S70–S76. (10.1038/nm1150) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson RM, May RM. 1982. Coevolution of hosts and parasites. Parasitology 85, 411–426. (10.1017/S0031182000055360) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmid-Hempel P. 2017. Parasites and their social hosts. Trends Parasitol. 33, 453–462. (10.1016/j.pt.2017.01.003) - DOI - PubMed