Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;21(3):230-231.
doi: 10.1177/1751143720938894. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

Evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of permissive hypotension in critically ill patients aged 65 years or over with vasodilatory hypotension: Statistical and health economic analysis plan for the 65 trial in article

Affiliations

Evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of permissive hypotension in critically ill patients aged 65 years or over with vasodilatory hypotension: Statistical and health economic analysis plan for the 65 trial in article

Karen Thomas et al. J Intensive Care Soc. 2020 Aug.

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Intensive Care Soc. 2020 Nov;21(4):359. doi: 10.1177/1751143720974828. Epub 2020 Nov 11. J Intensive Care Soc. 2020. PMID: 34394710 Free PMC article.

Abstract

The 65 trial is a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised clinical trial of permissive hypotension (targeting a mean arterial pressure target of 60-65 mmHg during vasopressor therapy) versus usual care in critically ill patients aged 65 years or over with vasodilatory hypotension. The trial will recruit 2600 patients from 65 United Kingdom adult general critical care units. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 90 days. An economic evaluation is embedded. This paper describes the proposed statistical and health economic analysis for the 65 trial.

Keywords: Vasopressors; clinical trial; critical care; health economics; intensive care; mean arterial pressure; statistical analysis plan.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Devlin NJ, Shah KK, Feng Y, et al. Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ 2018; 27: 7–22. - PMC - PubMed