Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2021 Sep;61(3):517-524.
doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00843-6. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

Technical considerations for CRT-D implantation in different varieties of persistent left superior vena cava

Luca Bontempi  1 , Mohamed Aboelhassan  2 , Manuel Cerini  1 , Francesca Salghetti  1 , Davide Fabbricatore  1 , Vincenzo Maiolo  1 , Giulia Ghizzoni  1 , Antonio Curnis  1
Affiliations
Case Reports

Technical considerations for CRT-D implantation in different varieties of persistent left superior vena cava

Luca Bontempi et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: The persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is usually asymptomatic and creates a challenge when detected incidentally during cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. The purpose of our cases is to show different anatomical variables of PLSVC and different strategies used for CRT-D implantation.

Methods: Four cases of PLSVC were presented. Pre-procedural bilateral venography was done to define anatomical variant of PLSVC. The side of approach and vein of approach were chosen according to the anatomical variant. Major challenges, electrical parameters, procedural times, long-term follow up, and complications were addressed.

Results: Two cases were de novo CRT-D implantation. One case was an extraction/re-implantation of the coil lead, and one case was an upgrading. In one case, CRT-D implantation was followed by AVN ablation. All cases had successful devices implantation. Two cases had isolated PLSVC: one of them had right approach and the other had left approach. One case had double SVC with no connecting brachiocephalic veins and underwent a left-sided approach. One case had double SVC with a small connecting brachiocephalic vein and had a left approach for implantation with using the small brachiocephalic vein for the RV lead. Electrical parameters were acceptable for all leads implanted. Long-term follow-up was done for 6 months to 5 years. One complication occurred (acute atrial lead dislodgement).

Conclusions: In our case series, the presence of PLSVC did not preclude successful placement of pacemaker/defibrillator leads using standard tools. Bilateral venography helped to decide the side and vein of lead insertion.

Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Implantable defibrillator lead; Persistent left superior vena cava.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Zhong YL, Long X-M, Jiang L-Y, He B-F, Lin H, Luo P, et al. Surgical treatment of dextroversion, isolated persistent left superior vena cava draining into the left atrium. J Card Surg. 2015;30(10):767–70. - DOI
    1. Elison B, Evans D, Zanders T, Jeanmonod R. Persistent left superior vena cava draining into the pulmonary venous system discovered after central venous catheter placement. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(8):943.e1–3. - DOI
    1. Lai YC, Goh JC, Lim SH, Seah TG. Difficult pulmonary artery catheterization in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998;26(6):671–3. - DOI
    1. Tak T, Crouch E, Drake GB. Persistent left superior vena cava: incidence, significance and clinical correlates. Int J Cardiol. 2002;82(1):91–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(01)00586-1 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schummer W, Schummer C, Frober R. Persistent left superior vena cava and central venous catheter position: clinical impact illustrated by four cases. SurgRadiol Anat. 2003;25(3–4):315–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0138-6 . - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources