Use of Tablets and Smartphones to Support Medical Decision Making in US Adults: Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 32784181
- PMCID: PMC7450375
- DOI: 10.2196/19531
Use of Tablets and Smartphones to Support Medical Decision Making in US Adults: Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background: Tablet and smartphone ownership have increased among US adults over the past decade. However, the degree to which people use mobile devices to help them make medical decisions remains unclear.
Objective: The objective of this study is to explore factors associated with self-reported use of tablets or smartphones to support medical decision making in a nationally representative sample of US adults.
Methods: Cross-sectional data from participants in the 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5, Cycle 2) were evaluated. There were 3504 responses in the full HINTS 5 Cycle 2 data set; 2321 remained after eliminating respondents who did not have complete data for all the variables of interest. The primary outcome was use of a tablet or smartphone to help make a decision about how to treat an illness or condition. Sociodemographic factors including gender, race/ethnicity, and education were evaluated. Additionally, mobile health (mHealth)- and electronic health (eHealth)-related factors were evaluated including (1) the presence of health and wellness apps on a tablet or smartphone, (2) use of electronic devices other than tablets and smartphones to monitor health (eg, Fitbit, blood glucose monitor, and blood pressure monitor), and (3) whether people shared health information from an electronic monitoring device or smartphone with a health professional within the last 12 months. Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted using SAS version 9.4. Weighted population estimates and standard errors, univariate odds ratios, and 95% CIs were calculated, comparing respondents who used tablets or smartphones to help make medical decisions (n=944) with those who did not (n=1377), separately for each factor. Factors of interest with a P value of <.10 were included in a subsequent multivariable logistic regression model.
Results: Compared with women, men had lower odds of reporting that a tablet or smartphone helped them make a medical decision. Respondents aged 75 and older also had lower odds of using a tablet or smartphone compared with younger respondents aged 18-34. By contrast, those who had health and wellness apps on tablets or smartphones, used other electronic devices to monitor health, and shared information from devices or smartphones with health care professionals had higher odds of reporting that tablets or smartphones helped them make a medical decision, compared with those who did not.
Conclusions: A limitation of this research is that information was not available regarding the specific health condition for which a tablet or smartphone helped people make a decision or the type of decision made (eg, surgery, medication changes). In US adults, mHealth and eHealth use, and also certain sociodemographic factors are associated with using tablets or smartphones to support medical decision making. Findings from this study may inform future mHealth and other digital health interventions designed to support medical decision making.
Keywords: cell phone; decision making; eHealth; health communication; mHealth; mobile phone; monitoring; ownership; physiologic; smartphone; surveys and questionnaires; tablets; telemedicine.
©Aisha Langford, Kerli Orellana, Jolaade Kalinowski, Carolyn Aird, Nancy Buderer. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 12.08.2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Mobile Phone Ownership, Health Apps, and Tablet Use in US Adults With a Self-Reported History of Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 14;7(1):e12228. doi: 10.2196/12228. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 31344667 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Smartphone and Tablet Use Among Patients With Hypertension: Secondary Analysis of Health Information National Trends Survey Data.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 24;24(1):e33188. doi: 10.2196/33188. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35072647 Free PMC article.
-
Use of eHealth and mHealth technology by persons with multiple sclerosis.Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 2. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019. PMID: 30296732
-
Asynchronous mHealth Interventions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Systematic Scoping Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 5;8(11):e19260. doi: 10.2196/19260. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 33151161 Free PMC article.
-
Educating Patients by Providing Timely Information Using Smartphone and Tablet Apps: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 13;22(4):e17342. doi: 10.2196/17342. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32281936 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Social and Demographic Patterns of Health-Related Internet Use Among Adults in the United States: A Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 19;17(18):6856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186856. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32961766 Free PMC article.
-
Enrollment and Retention of Participants in Remote Digital Health Studies: Scoping Review and Framework Proposal.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 9;24(9):e39910. doi: 10.2196/39910. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 36083626 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 21;11(7):e37729. doi: 10.2196/37729. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022. PMID: 35862187 Free PMC article.
-
Mobile Postoperative Symptom Intervention Tool and Biometric Monitoring After Radical Cystectomy: Pilot Study Evaluating Feasibility, Usability, and Potential Utility.J Urol. 2023 Feb;209(2):410-421. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003048. Epub 2022 Nov 9. J Urol. 2023. PMID: 36350586 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns and Influencing Factors of eHealth Tools Adoption Among Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Populations From the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2017-2019: Questionnaire Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 18;23(2):e25809. doi: 10.2196/25809. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33599619 Free PMC article.
References
-
- The Pew Research Center Mobile Fact Sheet. 2019. [2020-08-01]. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/
-
- Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T, International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/16908462 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Volk RJ, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Stacey D, Elwyn G. Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Nov 29;13(S2) doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous