Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Jan;106(1):93-95.
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319990. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

Danish premature birth rates during the COVID-19 lockdown

Affiliations
Observational Study

Danish premature birth rates during the COVID-19 lockdown

Gitte Hedermann et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

To explore the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on premature birth rates in Denmark, a nationwide register-based prevalence proportion study was conducted on all 31 180 live singleton infants born in Denmark between 12 March and 14 April during 2015-2020.The distribution of gestational ages (GAs) was significantly different (p=0.004) during the lockdown period compared with the previous 5 years and was driven by a significantly lower rate of extremely premature children during the lockdown compared with the corresponding mean rate for the same dates in the previous years (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.40, p<0.001). No significant difference between the lockdown and previous years was found for other GA categories.The reasons for this decrease are unclear. However, the lockdown has provided a unique opportunity to examine possible factors related to prematurity. Identification of possible causal mechanisms might stimulate changes in clinical practice.

Keywords: epidemiology; neonatology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MB has a patent (NeoHelp) with royalties paid.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of extremely premature and very premature births (permille of all births in the time period) during the lockdown period (12 March–14 April 2020) compared with aggregated birth data for the previous 5 years during the same date range (12 March–14 April 2015–2019). Inset graph: a comparison of extremely premature and very premature births born between 20 January and 22 February 2020 and an aggregate from that date range for the previous 5 years (20 January–22 February 2015–2019). Extremely premature (before 28+0 weeks’ gestation) and very premature (28+0–31+6 weeks’ gestation). Error bars represent 95% CIs.

References

    1. Yu N, Li W, Kang Q, et al. . Clinical features and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnant patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective, single-centre, descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:559–64. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30176-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller A-B, et al. . Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2019;7:e37–46. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30451-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vogel JP, Chawanpaiboon S, Moller A-B, et al. . The global epidemiology of preterm birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;52:3–12. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.04.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, et al. . Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008;371:75–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snijder CA, Brand T, Jaddoe V, et al. . Physically demanding work, fetal growth and the risk of adverse birth outcomes. the generation R study. Occup Environ Med 2012;69:543–50. 10.1136/oemed-2011-100615 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types