Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;41(3):460-467.
doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00774-0. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

The association between preeclampsia and ICD diagnosis of neonatal sepsis

Affiliations

The association between preeclampsia and ICD diagnosis of neonatal sepsis

Rachel K Harrison et al. J Perinatol. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Infants born to mothers with preeclampsia are at risk for many short and long-term complications. The objective of this study was to examine the association between preeclampsia and ICD diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in a large United States data set.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study from the Consortium on Safe Labor. A total of 180,277 women with a singleton gestation greater than 23 weeks were included. The primary outcome, neonatal sepsis, was compared between women stratified by diagnosis of preeclampsia using univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results: Of the 180,277 women eligible for analysis, 8331 (4.6%) were diagnosed with preeclampsia. Neonatal sepsis rates were higher among women diagnosed with preeclampsia (6.4 vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for confounders, the association between preeclampsia and neonatal sepsis remained significant (adjusted OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.60).

Conclusion: In this large cohort, the rate of neonatal sepsis ICD diagnosis was higher among women diagnosed with preeclampsia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 202: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e1–25.
    1. Langenveld J, Broekhuijsen K, van Baaren GJ, van Pampus MG, van Kaam AH, Groen H, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT-II): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:50. - DOI
    1. Cruz MO, Gao W, Hibbard JU. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes among women with gestational hypertension, mild preeclampsia, and mild chronic hypertension. AM J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:260. - DOI
    1. Lu CQ, Lin J, Yuan L, Zhou JG, Liang K, Zhong QH, et al. Pregnancy induced hypertension and outcomes in early and moderate preterm infants. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;14:68–71. - DOI
    1. Jelin AC, Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Kaimal AJ, Little SE, Caughey AB. Early-onset preeclampsia and neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:389–92. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources