Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;9(5):318-323.
doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00602-3.

Considerations for using race and ethnicity as quantitative variables in medical education research

Paula T Ross  1 , Tamera Hart-Johnson  2 , Sally A Santen  3 , Nikki L Bibler Zaidi  2
Affiliations

Considerations for using race and ethnicity as quantitative variables in medical education research

Paula T Ross et al. Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Throughout history, race and ethnicity have been used as key descriptors to categorize and label individuals. The use of these concepts as variables can impact resources, policy, and perceptions in medical education. Despite the pervasive use of race and ethnicity as quantitative variables, it is unclear whether researchers use them in their proper context. In this Eye Opener, we present the following seven considerations with corresponding recommendations, for using race and ethnicity as variables in medical education research: 1) Ensure race and ethnicity variables are used to address questions directly related to these concepts. 2) Use race and ethnicity to represent social experiences, not biological facts, to explain the phenomenon under study. 3) Allow study participants to define their preferred racial and ethnic identity. 4) Collect complete and accurate race and ethnicity data that maximizes data richness and minimizes opportunities for researchers' assumptions about participants' identity. 5) Follow evidence-based practices to describe and collapse individual-level race and ethnicity data into broader categories. 6) Align statistical analyses with the study's conceptualization and operationalization of race and ethnicity. 7) Provide thorough interpretation of results beyond simple reporting of statistical significance. By following these recommendations, medical education researchers can avoid major pitfalls associated with the use of race and ethnicity and make informed decisions around some of the most challenging race and ethnicity topics in medical education.

Keywords: Ethnicity; Quantitative methods; Race; Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P.T. Ross, T. Hart-Johnson, S.A. Santen and N.L. B. Zaidi declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Davis J. Reconsidering the use of race as an explanatory variable in program evaluation. New Dir Program Eval. 1992;53:55–67.
    1. Wilkinson D, King G. Conceputal and methodological issues in the use of race as a variable: policy implications. Milbank Quart. 1987;65(Suppl 1):56–71. - PubMed
    1. Blake-Kelly K, Garrison N, Fletcher F, et al. Rationales for expanding minority physican respresentation in the workforce: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2018;52(9):925–935. - PubMed
    1. Terrell C, Beaudreau J. 3000 by 2000 and beyond: Next steps for promoting diversity in the health professions. J Dent Educ. 2003;67(9):1048–1052. - PubMed
    1. Sklar D. New conversations: justice, disparities, and meeting the needs of our most vulnerable populations. Acad Med. 2017;92(11):1506–1507. - PubMed