Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;12(1):37-52.
doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00481-5. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

Impacts of personal DNA ancestry testing

Affiliations

Impacts of personal DNA ancestry testing

Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich et al. J Community Genet. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Consumer uptake of direct-to-consumer (DTC) DNA ancestry testing is accelerating, yet few empirical studies have examined test impacts on recipients despite the DTC ancestry industry being two decades old. Participants in a longitudinal cohort study of response to health-related DTC genomic testing also received personal DNA ancestry testing at no additional cost. Baseline survey data from the primary study were analyzed together with responses to an additional follow-up survey focused on the response to ancestry results. Ancestry results were generated for 3466 individuals. Of those, 1317 accessed their results, and 322 individuals completed an ancestry response survey, in other words, approximately one in ten who received ancestry testing responded to the survey. Self-reported race/ethnicity was predictive of those most likely to view their results. While 46% of survey responders (N = 147) reported their ancestry results as surprising or unexpected, less than 1% (N = 3) were distressed by them. Importantly, however, 21% (N = 67) reported that their results reshaped their personal identity. Most (81%; N = 260) planned to share results with family, and 12% (N = 39) intended to share results with a healthcare provider. Many (61%; N = 196) reported test benefits (e.g., health insights), while 12% (N = 38) reported negative aspects (e.g., lack of utility). Over half (N = 162) reported being more likely to have other genetic tests in the future. DNA ancestry testing affected individuals with respect to personal identity, intentions to share genetic information with family and healthcare providers, and the likelihood to engage with other genetic tests in the future. These findings have implications for medical care and research, specifically, provider readiness to engage with genetic ancestry information.

Keywords: Direct-to-consumer testing; Ethnicity; Genetic ancestry; Personal genetic information; Race.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flowchart

References

    1. Bader AC, Malhi RS. Case study on ancestry estimation in an Alaskan native family: identity and safeguards against reductionism. Hum Biol. 2015;87(4):338–351. - PubMed
    1. Blanchard JW, Tallbull G, Wolpert C, Powell J, Foster MW, Royal C. Barriers and strategies related to qualitative research on genetic ancestry testing in indigenous communities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2017;12(3):169–179. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanchard JW, Outram S, Tallbull G, Royal CD, Leroux D, Lund J, et al. We Don’t need a swab in our mouth to prove who we are. Curr Anthropol. 2019;60(5):000–000. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blell M, Hunter M (2019) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing’s red herring:“genetic ancestry” and personalized medicine. Frontiers in medicine 6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bloss CS, Ornowski L, Silver E, Cargill M, Vanier V, Schork NJ, Topol EJ. Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments. Genetics in Medicine. 2010;12(9):556–566. - PubMed