Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1988 Mar;59(3):288-91.
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90174-6.

Accuracy of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Accuracy of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures

C C Lin et al. J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Mar.

Abstract

The accuracy of 12 impression materials of six different types were studied by using complete-arch FPD impressions. Sixty impressions were made of a Columbia dentoform maxillary model with complete cast crown abutment preparations on the canines and the second molars. A one-piece casting was constructed by connecting the four individual castings made for the four abutment teeth. The master prosthesis was seated on the stone casts produced from the impressions. The marginal adaptation on the four abutments was then evaluated with a travelling microscope. The individual marginal adaptation of the four castings on the abutments was also examined after sectioning the four joints. The following conclusions were drawn. 1. The polyethers produced the most accurate complete-arch replicas. The second most accurate were the vinyl polysiloxanes, followed by the polysulfides and the irreversible-reversible hydrocolloids. The least accurate were the reversible hydrocolloids and the irreversible hydrocolloids. 2. The polyether impression materials exhibited the most consistent accuracy for a master cast to fabricate a complete-arch FPD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources