Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;64(7):624-630.
doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_920_19. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block

Affiliations

A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block

Vijayalakshmi Sivapurapu et al. Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aims: The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (USG ICBPB) is a popular technique for forearm surgeries distal to the elbow. Our study details the ultrasound (US) characteristics of this block and the structures encountered by the needle in four approaches to the infraclavicular area - lateral infraclavicular (LICF), costoclavicular medial to lateral (CML) and lateral to medial (CLM) and retroclavicular (R) by anatomical dissection.

Methods: USG ICBPB was performed in 10 cadavers-5 on the right side and 5 on the left side by each of four approaches and with an 18 gauge Tuohy needle kept in situ, and US characteristics were noted. Anatomical dissection was done and important structures were described in detail.

Results: Needle tip and shaft visibility were least with LICF approach and best in R approach. Needle angle correlated with chest and neck circumference in LICF and CML groups. During dissection, in all approaches, neurovascular structures have been observed in the near vicinity of the needle, especially the thoracoacromial artery (TAA) or its branches. In the R approach, the 'blind spot' behind the clavicle is an area where neurovascular structures were present.

Conclusion: The R approach gives better visibility of needle shaft beyond the clavicle, but the clavicle acts as a 'blind-spot' for the US beam obliterating important neurovascular structures. The various neurovascular structures the needle traverses or in its immediate vicinity, do not necessarily make the CML, CLM or R approach any better than the LICF approach.

Keywords: Brachial plexus; cadaver; dissection; nerve block; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a and b) Important neurovascular structures in vicinity of the four approaches (the arrows in violet represent the path taken by needles in each of four approaches) of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. PM-Pectoralis Major. Pm-Pectoralis Minor. C-Clavicle. TAA-Thoraco-abdominal artery. AA-Axillary Artery. AV-Axillary Vein. LC-Lateral Cord. LICB-Lateral Infra Clavicular Brachial Plexus Block approach. CML-Costoclavicular medial to lateral approach. CLM-Costoclavicular lateral to medial approach. R-Retroclavicular approach

References

    1. Sandhu NS, Capan LM. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:254–9. - PubMed
    1. Luftig J, Mantuani D, Herring AA, Nagdev A. Ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity emergency procedures. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35:773–7. - PubMed
    1. Sala-Blanch X, Reina MA, Pangthipampai P, Karmakar MK. Anatomic basis for brachial plexus block at the costoclavicular space: A cadaver anatomic study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:387–91. - PubMed
    1. Li JW, Songthamwat B, Samy W, Sala-Blanch X, Karmakar MK. Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block: Sonoanatomy, technique, and block dynamics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42:233–40. - PubMed
    1. Nieuwveld D, Mojica V, Herrera AE, Pomés J, Prats A, Sala-Blanch X. Medial approach of ultrasound-guided costoclavicular plexus block and its effects on regional perfussion. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017;64:198–205. - PubMed