The Influence of Delayed Blastocyst Development on the Outcome of Frozen-Thawed Transfer of Euploid and Untested Embryos
- PMID: 32792766
- PMCID: PMC7394094
- DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_115_19
The Influence of Delayed Blastocyst Development on the Outcome of Frozen-Thawed Transfer of Euploid and Untested Embryos
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective is to compare live birth rates (LBRs) following frozen embryo transfer (FET) of euploid day 5 with day 6 blastocysts. We also compared LBRs following FET of untested blastocysts vitrified on day 5 and day 6 in self-oocyte and ovum donation (OD) cycles.
Design: This was a retrospective observational study.
Setting: Nova IVF Fertility, Ahmedabad.
Materials and methods: Ninety-seven FET using self-oocytes following preimplantation genetic testing A (PGT-A), 464 FET following OD, and 907 FET using self-oocytes without PGT-A testing between January 2016 and December 2017 were included in this study.
Main outcome measures: LBR following FET in day 5 versus day 6 blastocysts in euploid embryos using self-oocytes and in untested embryos using both self and donor oocytes.
Results: In PGT-A cycles, no statistically significant difference was observed in LBRs following transfer of euploid blastocysts developed on day 5 or day 6 (D5: 53%; D6:40%, P = 0.83). However, the LBRs with day 5 blastocysts were higher compared with day 6 group in untested group using both self and donor oocytes (self D5: 52.7%; D6: 38.2%; P = 0.001 and OD D5: 44.7%; D6: 29.8%; P = 0.001). Miscarriage rates were comparable in both the groups.
Conclusions: The present study demonstrated comparable pregnancy outcomes following FET of euploid embryos vitrified on day 5 and day 6. However, higher LBRs were reported in day 5 group in untested embryos.
Keywords: Day 5 blastocyst transfer; day 6 blastocyst transfer; euploid blastocyst transfer; frozen embryo transfer; preimplantation genetic testing.
Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Le Lannou D, Griveau JF, Laurent MC, Gueho A, Veron E, Morcel K. Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:368–75. - PubMed
-
- Gosden RG. Oogenesis as a foundation for embryogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002;186:149–53. - PubMed
-
- Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Wells D. Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20:117–26. - PubMed
-
- Blake DD, Proctor M, Johnson N, Olive D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2002;(2) - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources