Oncologic Outcomes of Complex Segmentectomy: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Abstract

Background: Complex segmentectomy creates several intricate intersegmental planes; however, it has not been fully established in lung cancer treatment. We compared the oncologic outcomes of complex segmentectomy and lobectomy through a large cohort, multicenter database using propensity score-matched analysis.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 1517 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer with a solid component size 2.0 cm or less, who underwent surgical resection at 3 institutions between 2010 and 2018. Complex segmentectomy (n = 240) and location-adjusted lobectomy (n = 851) as well as surgical results were analyzed for all patients and their propensity score-matched pairs.

Results: The prognosis of patients undergoing complex segmentectomy was not significantly different from that of patients undergoing lobectomy (5-year cancer-specific survival [CSS] rate, 96.4% versus 97.2%, P = .69; and 5-year recurrence-free interval [RFI] rate, 95.8% versus 93.4%, P = .19). This trend was also identified in subanalyses for pure solid tumors. However, there were major differences in clinicopathologic features between the 2 groups. After propensity score-matched analysis, proper matching of patients was ascertained. In 219 propensity score-matched pairs, long-term outcomes were similar between patients undergoing complex segmentectomy (5-year CSS, 96.0%; 5-year RFI, 95.5%) and lobectomy (5-year CSS, 97.8%; 5-year RFI, 95.9%). Propensity score-adjusted multivariable analysis for RFI revealed that prognosis associated with complex segmentectomy was comparable to the prognosis obtained with lobectomy (hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-2.40; P = .98).

Conclusions: Complex segmentectomy provides acceptable oncologic outcomes in clinical stage I lung cancer treatment.