Workforce, Workload, and Burnout in Critical Care Organizations: Survey Results and Research Agenda
- PMID: 32796183
- PMCID: PMC8424534
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004552
Workforce, Workload, and Burnout in Critical Care Organizations: Survey Results and Research Agenda
Abstract
Objectives: This report provides analyses and perspective of a survey of critical care workforce, workload, and burnout among the intensivists and advanced practice providers of established U.S. and Canadian critical care organizations and provides a research agenda.
Design: A 97-item electronic survey questionnaire was distributed to the leaders of 27 qualifying organizations.
Setting: United States and Canada.
Participants: Leaders of critical care organizations in the United States and Canada.
Interventions: None.
Data synthesis and main results: We received 23 responses (85%). The critical care organization survey recorded substantial variability of most organizational aspects that were not restricted by the critical care organization definition or regulatory mandates. The most common physician staffing model was a combination of full-time and part-time intensivists. Approximately 80% of critical care organizations had dedicated advanced practice providers that staffed some or all their ICUs. Full-time intensivists worked a median of 168 days (range 42-192 d) in the ICU (168 shifts = 24 7-d wk). The median shift duration was 12 hours (range, 7-14 hr), and the median number of consecutive shifts allowed was 7 hours (range 7-14 hr). More than half of critical care organizations reported having burnout prevention programs targeted to ICU physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurses.
Conclusions: The variability of current approaches suggests that systematic comparative analyses could identify best organizational practices. The research agenda for the study of critical care organizations should include studies that provide insights regarding the effects of the integrative structure of critical care organizations on outcomes at the levels of our patients, our workforce, our work practices, and sustainability.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Advancing Critical Care Through Organizational Structure.Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):1692-1693. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004634. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 33038159 No abstract available.
References
-
- Leung S, Gregg SR, Coopersmith CM, et al.Critical Care Organizations: Business of Critical Care and Value/Performance Building. Crit Care Med 2018;46(1):1–11. - PubMed
-
- Pastores SM, Kvetan V, Coopersmith CM, et al.Workforce, Workload, and Burnout Among Intensivists and Advanced Practice Providers: A Narrative Review. Crit Care Med 2019;47(4):550–557. - PubMed
-
- Pastores SM, Halpern NA, Oropello JM, et al.Critical Care Organizations in Academic Medical Centers in North America: A Descriptive Report. Crit Care Med 2015;43(10):2239–2244. - PubMed
-
- Lilly CM, Fisher KA, Ries M, et al.A national ICU telemedicine survey: validation and results. Chest 2012;142(1):40–47. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
