Can a Novel Deep Neural Network Improve the Computer-Aided Detection of Solid Pulmonary Nodules and the Rate of False-Positive Findings in Comparison to an Established Machine Learning Computer-Aided Detection?
- PMID: 32796198
- DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000713
Can a Novel Deep Neural Network Improve the Computer-Aided Detection of Solid Pulmonary Nodules and the Rate of False-Positive Findings in Comparison to an Established Machine Learning Computer-Aided Detection?
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 2 approved computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for detection of pulmonary solid nodules (PSNs) in an oncologic cohort. The first CAD system is based on a conventional machine learning approach (VD10F), and the other is based on a deep 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) CAD software (VD20A).
Methods and materials: Nine hundred sixty-seven patients with a total of 2451 PSNs were retrospectively evaluated using the 2 different CAD systems. All patients had thin-slice chest computed tomography (0.6 mm) using 100 kV and 100 mAs and a high-resolution kernel (I50f). The CAD images generated by VD10F were transferred to the PACS for evaluation. The images generated by VD20A were evaluated using a Web browser-based viewer. Finally, a senior radiologist who was blinded for the CAD results examined the thin-slice images of every patient (ground truth).
Results: A total of 2451 PSNs were detected by the senior radiologist. CAD-VD10F detected 1401 true-positive, 143 false-negative, 565 false-positive (FP), and 342 true-negative PSNs, resulting in sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 37.7%, positive predictive value of 0.71, and negative predictive value of 0.70. CAD-VD20A detected 1381 true-positive, 163 false-negative, 337 FP, and 570 true-negative PSNs, resulting in sensitivity of 89.4%, specificity of 62.8%, positive predictive value of 0.80, and negative predictive value 0.77, respectively. The rate of FP per scan was 0.6 for CAD-VD10F and 0.3 for CAD-VD20A.
Conclusions: The new deep learning-based CAD software (VD20A) shows similar sensitivity with the conventional CAD software (VD10F), but a significantly higher specificity.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: M.S.H. has received institutional research support from Siemens Healthineers Germany and GE USA. He is a scientific advisor of Siemens Healthineers Germany and has received speaker’s honorarium from Siemens Healthineers Germany and GE USA. R.G. is an employee of Siemens Healthcare AG, Germany. For the remaining authors, none were declared.
References
-
- Fraioli F, Serra G, Passariello R. CAD (computed-aided detection) and CADx (computer aided diagnosis) systems in identifying and characterising lung nodules on chest CT: overview of research, developments and new prospects. Radiol Med . 2010;115:385–3402.
-
- Fraioli F, Bertoletti L, Napoli A, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in lung cancer screening at chest MDCT: ROC analysis of CAD versus radiologist performance. J Thorac Imaging . 2007;22:241–246.
-
- Hirose T, Nitta N, Shiraishi J, et al. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software for the detection of lung nodules on multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT): JAFROC study for the improvement in radiologists' diagnostic accuracy. Acad Radiol . 2008;15:1505–1512.
-
- Nadealian Z, Nazari B, Sadri S, et al. Detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose computed tomography using localized active contours and shape features. J Med Signals Sens . 2017;7:203–212.
-
- Marten K, Engelke C. Computer-aided detection and automated CT volumetry of pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol . 2007;17:888–901.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous