Muscle Cramping in the Marathon: Dehydration and Electrolyte Depletion vs. Muscle Damage
- PMID: 32796418
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003713
Muscle Cramping in the Marathon: Dehydration and Electrolyte Depletion vs. Muscle Damage
Abstract
Martínez-Navarro, I, Montoya-Vieco, A, Collado, E, Hernando, B, Panizo, N, and Hernando, C. Muscle Cramping in the marathon: Dehydration and electrolyte depletion vs. muscle damage. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1629-1635, 2022-Our aim was to compare dehydration variables, serum electrolytes, and muscle damage serum markers between runners who suffered exercise-associated muscle cramps (EAMC) and runners who did not suffer EAMC in a road marathon. We were also interested in analyzing race pacing and training background. Nighty-eight marathoners took part in the study. Subjects were subjected to a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Before and after the race, blood and urine samples were collected and body mass (BM) was measured. Immediately after the race EAMC were diagnosed. Eighty-eight runners finished the marathon, and 20 of them developed EAMC (24%) during or immediately after the race. Body mass change, post-race urine specific gravity, and serum sodium and potassium concentrations were not different between crampers and noncrampers. Conversely, runners who suffered EAMC exhibited significantly greater post-race creatine kinase (464.17 ± 220.47 vs. 383.04 ± 253.41 UI/L, p = 0.034) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (362.27 ± 72.10 vs. 307.87 ± 52.42 UI/L, p = 0.002). Twenty-four hours post-race also values of both biomarkers were higher among crampers (CK: 2,438.59 ± 2,625.24 vs. 1,166.66 ± 910.71 UI/L, p = 0.014; LDH: 277.05 ± 89.74 vs. 227.07 ± 37.15 UI/L, p = 0.021). The difference in the percentage of runners who included strength conditioning in their race training approached statistical significance (EAMC: 25%, non-EAMC: 47.6%; p = 0.074). Eventually, relative speed between crampers and noncrampers only differed from the 25th km onward (p < 0.05). Therefore, runners who suffered EAMC did not exhibit a greater degree of dehydration and electrolyte depletion after the marathon but displayed significantly higher concentrations of muscle damage biomarkers.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03155633.
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
References
-
- Bernat-Adell MD, Collado-Boira EJ, Moles-Julio P, et al. Recovery of inflammation, cardiac, and muscle damage biomarkers after running a marathon. J Strength Cond Res 35: 626–632, 2021.
-
- Braulick KW, Miller KC, Albrecht JM, Tucker JM, Deal JE. Significant and serious dehydration does not affect skeletal muscle cramp threshold frequency. Br J Sports Med 47: 710–714, 2013.
-
- Clifford T, Allerton DM, Brown MA, et al. Minimal muscle damage after a marathon and no influence of beetroot juice on inflammation and recovery. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 42: 263–270, 2017.
-
- Damasceno MV, Lima-Silva AE, Pasqua LA, et al. Effects of resistance training on neuromuscular characteristics and pacing during 10-km running time trial. Eur J Appl Physiol 115: 1513–1522, 2015.
-
- Del Coso J, Fernandez de Velasco D, Abian-Vicen J, et al. Running pace decrease during a marathon is positively related to blood markers of muscle damage. PLoS One 8: e57602, 2013.
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials