Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation
- PMID: 32797247
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06217-9
Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation
Abstract
Purpose: To systematically review the outcomes of surgical treatments of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
Methods: Studies were identified by electronic databases (Ovid, PubMed). All studies reporting functional and radiological outcomes of surgical treatments of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations were included. Following data were extracted: authors and year, study design, level of evidence, number of patients, age, classification of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, time to surgery, surgical technique, follow-up, clinical and imaging outcomes, complications, and failures. Descriptive statistics was used, when a data pooling was not possible. Comparable outcomes were pooled to generate summary outcomes reported as frequency-weighted values. Quality appraisal was assessed through the MINORS checklist.
Results: One hundred and thirty-three studies were included for a total of 4473 shoulders. Mean age of participants was 36.9 years. Mean follow-up was 42.06 months. Arthroscopy showed better ASES (p < 0.0001) and lower VAS pain score (p = 0.0249) compared to an open approach. Biologic and synthetic reconstructions demonstrated better results over osteosynthesis techniques. Biologic techniques showed overall better Constant (p = 0.0001) and DASH (p = 0.0215) scores, while synthetic reconstruction showed better UCLA score (p = 0.0001). Among suture buttons, triple button showed overall better results in Constant (p = 0.0001) and VAS (p = 0.0001) scores, while better results in DASH score (p = 0.0003) were achieved by 2 double button techniques. Overall, the level of evidence was low.
Conclusion: Biological and synthetic reconstructions achieved better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis. Among suture buttons, the triple button showed better functional performance.
Level of evidence: IV.
Keywords: Acromioclavicular; Acromioclavicular ligament; Biologic; Coracoclavicular ligament; Dislocation; Instability; Plate; Reconstruction; Screws; Synthetic; Tendon graft.
References
-
- Abdelrahman AA, Ibrahim A, Abdelghaffar K, Ghandour TM, Eldib D (2019) Open versus modified arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation using a single tight rope: randomized comparative study of clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28:2090–2097 - PubMed - DOI
-
- Acar MA, Güleç A, Erkoçak ÖF, Yılmaz G, Durgut F, Elmadağ M (2015) Percutaneous double-button fixation method for treatment of acute type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 49:241–248 - PubMed
-
- Arirachakaran A, Boonard M, Piyapittayanun P, Kanchanatawan W, Chaijenkij K, Prommahachai A, Kongtharvonskul J (2017) Post-operative outcomes and complications of suspensory loop fixation device versus hook plate in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Traumatol 18:293–304 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
-
- Assaghir YM (2011) Outcome of exact anatomic repair and coracoclavicular cortical lag screw in acute acromioclavicular dislocations. J Trauma 71:E50–54 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
