Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Nov;31(11):1518-1525.
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2064. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

TBCRC 030: a phase II study of preoperative cisplatin versus paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer: evaluating the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) biomarker

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

TBCRC 030: a phase II study of preoperative cisplatin versus paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer: evaluating the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) biomarker

E L Mayer et al. Ann Oncol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Cisplatin and paclitaxel are active in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Despite different mechanisms of action, effective predictive biomarkers to preferentially inform drug selection have not been identified. The homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.) detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair and may identify patients with BRCA1/2-proficient tumors that are sensitive to DNA-targeting therapy. The primary objective of TBCRC 030 was to detect an association of HRD with pathologic response [residual cancer burden (RCB)-0/1] to single-agent cisplatin or paclitaxel.

Patients and methods: This prospective phase II study enrolled patients with germline BRCA1/2 wild-type/unknown stage I-III TNBC in a 12-week randomized study of preoperative cisplatin or paclitaxel. The HRD assay was carried out on baseline tissue; positive HRD was defined as a score ≥33. Crossover to an alternative chemotherapy was offered if there was inadequate response.

Results: One hundred and thirty-nine patients were evaluable for response, including 88 (63.3%) who had surgery at 12 weeks and 51 (36.7%) who crossed over to an alternative provider-selected preoperative chemotherapy regimen due to inadequate clinical response. HRD results were available for 104 tumors (74.8%) and 74 (71.1%) were HRD positive. The RCB-0/1 rate was 26.4% with cisplatin and 22.3% with paclitaxel. No significant association was observed between HRD score and RCB response to either cisplatin [odds ratio (OR) for RCB-0/1 if HRD positive 2.22 (95% CI: 0.39-23.68)] or paclitaxel [OR for RCB-0/1 if HRD positive 0.90 (95% CI: 0.19-4.95)]. There was no evidence of an interaction between HRD and pathologic response to chemotherapy.

Conclusions: In this prospective preoperative trial in TNBC, HRD was not predictive of pathologic response. Tumors were similarly responsive to preoperative paclitaxel or cisplatin chemotherapy.

Keywords: HRD; Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); cisplatin; neoadjuvant; paclitaxel; preoperative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Consort diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
HRD score distribution for the response-evaluable population. BRCA-deficient tumors include those with germline or somatic BRCA1/2 gene mutations. Abbreviations: HRD, homologous recombination deficiency.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Box plots of HRD score versus pathologic response for all response-evaluable patients. A. Response classified by RCB score, where RCB-0/1 = response, and RCB-2/3/crossover = non-response B. Response classified by pCR, where pCR = response and no pCR/crossover = no response. Box outlines the 25th and 75th percentiles; solid line is the median; whiskers extend to the most extreme data point that is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range. Abbreviations: HRD, homologous recombination deficiency; pCR, pathologic complete response; RCB, residual cancer burden.

References

    1. Lin NU, Vanderplas A, Hughes ME et al.Clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with triple-negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cancer 2012;118:5463–5472. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silver DP, Richardson AL, Eklund AC et al.Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1145–1153. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Isakoff SJ, Mayer EL, He L et al.TBCRC009: A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial of Platinum Monotherapy With Biomarker Assessment in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:1902–1909. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tutt A, Tovey H, Cheang MCU et al.Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: the TNT Trial. Nat Med 2018;24:628–637. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tung N, Arun B, Hacker MR et al.TBCRC 031: Randomized Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin Versus Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide in Germline BRCA Carriers With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer (the INFORM trial). J Clin Oncol 2020;38:1539–1548 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms