Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis
- PMID: 32800976
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.053
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been increasingly used in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has shown several advantages over open surgery in dealing with GC, although it is still considered a demanding procedure. Robotic gastrectomy (RG) is now being employed with increased frequency worldwide and has been reported to overcome some limitations of conventional LG. The aim of this updated meta-analysis is to compare surgical and oncological outcomes of RG versus LG for gastric cancer.
Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane library database of published studies comparing RG and LG up to March 2020. The evaluated end-points were intra-operative, post-operative and oncological outcomes. Dichotomous data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) and continuous data were calculated by mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and a random-effect model was always applied.
Results: Forty retrospective studies describing 17,712 patients met the inclusion criteria. With respect to surgical outcomes, robotic compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy was associated with higher operating time [MD 44.73, (95%CI 36.01, 53.45) p < 0.00001] and less intraoperative blood loss [MD -18.24, (95%CI -25.21, -11.26) p < 0.00001] and lower rate of surgical complication in terms of Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3 classification [OR 0.66, (95%CI 0.49, 0.88) p = 0.005]. With respect to oncological outcomes, the RG group showed a significantly increased mean number of retrieved lymph nodes [MD 1.84, (95%CI 0.84, 2.84) p = 0.0003], but mean proximal and distal resection margin distance and the recurrence rate were not significantly different between the two approaches.
Conclusions: With respect to safety, technical feasibility and oncological adequacy, robotic and laparoscopic groups were comparable, although the robotic approach seems to achieve better short-term surgical outcomes. Moreover, a higher rate of retrieved lymph nodes was observed in the RG group.
Keywords: Gastric cancer; Minimally invasive gastrectomy; Radical gastrectomy; Robotic surgery.
Copyright © 2020 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
An invited commentary on "Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis".Int J Surg. 2020 Nov;83:159-160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Sep 25. Int J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32980516 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2810-5. Trials. 2018. PMID: 30064474 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(7):1450-1463. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_798_18. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019. PMID: 31939422
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov 24;18(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02080-7. World J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33234134 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Gastric Cancer Surgery: Short-Term Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 25,521 Patients.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Aug;33(8):782-800. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0136. Epub 2023 May 18. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023. PMID: 37204324
-
Efficacy and safety of robotic vs. laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8045-8056. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001826. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38874467 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of long-term outcomes after robotic versus laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: a propensity score-matching study.Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8047-8059. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09245-3. Epub 2022 Jun 28. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35764839
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex pediatric surgical conditions.Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8404-8420. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10399-x. Epub 2023 Sep 18. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37721590
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial.Nat Commun. 2024 May 31;15(1):4668. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49013-6. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38821945 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):6761-6770. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10122-w. Epub 2023 May 23. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37221415
-
Comparing the Effectiveness of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy in the United States: A Retrospective Analysis of Perioperative, Oncologic, and Survival Outcomes.J Surg Res. 2024 Dec;304:196-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.014. Epub 2024 Nov 16. J Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39551014
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous