Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 5:14:1381-1388.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S256314. eCollection 2020.

Patient Satisfaction and Food Waste in Obstetrics And Gynaecology Wards

Affiliations

Patient Satisfaction and Food Waste in Obstetrics And Gynaecology Wards

Sara Schiavone et al. Patient Prefer Adherence. .

Abstract

Introduction: Patient satisfaction is an indicator of healthcare quality, and expectation is an important determinant. A component of patient satisfaction is the quality of foodservice. An indicator of this quality is the food wasted by hospitalised patients. In the present study, we investigated patient satisfaction regarding food and foodservice, the expectation on food quality and the amount of food wasted in two obstetrics and gynaecology wards in Northern and Southern Italy.

Patients and methods: A questionnaire, including sociodemographic data, rate of food waste, expectations of food quality and characteristics of food and foodservice, was administrated to 550 inpatients in obstetrics and gynaecology wards (275 for each hospital). Univariate analysis was performed to describe the results, and multivariate analysis was carried out to control for sociodemographic data.

Results: Northern patients were more satisfied with the quality of food (54.2% vs 36.0%) and foodservice (54.5% vs 38.2%) than southern patients. Northern patients had more positive expectations about the quality of food (69.5% vs 31.6%), whereas southern patients stated that they had no expectations. Southern patients gave more importance to mealtime (72.7% vs 26.2%), and many of them brought food from home to the hospital (30.2% vs 2.2%) through relatives who came to visit them. Southern patients discarded about 41.7% of food served, whereas northern patients discarded only about 15.3%.

Discussion: Food waste is a worldwide problem due to its economic, social and environmental effects. Especially in hospitals, food waste could have a negative impact on the overall patient satisfaction.

Keywords: food quality; food service; food waste; hospital; patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prakash B. Patient satisfaction. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010;3(3):151–155. doi:10.4103/0974-2077.74491 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Busse R. Improving Healthcare Quality in Europe: Characteristics, Effectiveness and Implementation of Different Strategies. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2019. - PubMed
    1. Batbaatar E, Dorjdagva J, Luvsannyam A, Savino MM, Amenta P. Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Perspect Public Health. 2017;137(2):89–101. doi:10.1177/1757913916634136 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kravitz RL. Measuring patients’ expectations and requests. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(9 Pt 2):881–888. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-9_part_2-200105011-00012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dall’Oglio I, Nicolò R, Di Ciommo V, et al. A systematic review of hospital foodservice patient satisfaction studies. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(4):567–584. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2014.11.013 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources