Mandatory Waiting Periods Before Abortion and Sterilization: Theory and Practice
- PMID: 32801935
- PMCID: PMC7402852
- DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S257178
Mandatory Waiting Periods Before Abortion and Sterilization: Theory and Practice
Abstract
Some laws insist on a fixed, compulsory waiting period between the time of obtaining consent and when abortions or sterilizations are carried out. Waiting periods are designed to allow for reflection on the decision and to minimize regret. In fact, the cognitive processing needed for these important decisions takes place relatively rapidly. Clinicians are used to handling cases individually and tailoring care appropriately, including giving more time for decision-making. Psychological considerations in relation to the role of emotion in decision-making, eg, regret, raise the possibility that waiting periods could have a detrimental impact on the emotional wellbeing of those concerned which might interfere with decision-making. Having an extended period of time to consider how much regret one might feel as a consequence of the decision one is faced with may make a person revisit a stable decision. In abortion care, waiting periods often result in an extra appointment being needed, delays in securing a procedure and personal distress for the applicant. Some women end up being beyond the gestational limit for abortion. Those requesting sterilization in a situation of active conflict in their relationship will do well to postpone a decision on sterilization. Otherwise, applicants for sterilization should not be forced to wait. Forced waiting undermines people's agency and autonomous decision-making ability. Low-income groups are particularly disadvantaged. It may be discriminatory when applied to marginalized groups. Concern about the validity of consent is best addressed by protective clinical guidelines rather than through rigid legislation. Waiting periods breach reproductive rights. Policymakers and politicians in countries that have waiting periods in sexual and reproductive health regulation should review relevant laws and policies and bring them into line with scientific and ethical evidence and international human rights law.
Keywords: abortion; decision-making; mandatory; psychology; sterilization; waiting period.
© 2020 Rowlands and Thomas.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
The impact of mandatory waiting periods on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):1232. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13620-z. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35725439 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethics of a Mandatory Waiting Period for Female Sterilization.Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Jul;52(4):17-25. doi: 10.1002/hast.1405. Hastings Cent Rep. 2022. PMID: 35993104 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993 Apr;8(Suppl. 1):148-59. doi: 10.1159/000263882. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993. PMID: 11653014
-
Abortion Patients' Experience and Perceptions of Waiting Periods: Survey Evidence before Arizona's Two-visit 24-hour Mandatory Waiting Period Law.Womens Health Issues. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):60-6. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 25. Womens Health Issues. 2016. PMID: 26626710
-
How patients view mandatory waiting periods for abortion.Fam Plann Perspect. 1981 Mar-Apr;13(2):75-9. Fam Plann Perspect. 1981. PMID: 7250344
Cited by
-
Legal and policy responses to the delivery of abortion care during COVID-19.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;151(3):479-486. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13377. Epub 2020 Oct 5. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020. PMID: 32931598 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of mandatory waiting periods on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):1232. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13620-z. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35725439 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reproductive Justice as a Framework for Abortion Care.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec 1;66(4):655-664. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000811. Epub 2023 Sep 18. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37750671 Free PMC article.
-
Ethics of a Mandatory Waiting Period for Female Sterilization.Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Jul;52(4):17-25. doi: 10.1002/hast.1405. Hastings Cent Rep. 2022. PMID: 35993104 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Variation in the interpretation and application of the Medicaid sterilization consent form among Medicaid officials.Contraception. 2022 May;109:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 14. Contraception. 2022. PMID: 35038447 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McLean SAM. Abortion law: is consensual reform possible? in: McLean SAM, editor. Medical Law and Ethics. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018:249–266.
-
- Kahneman D, Tversky A. The psychology of preferences. Sci Am. 1982;246(1):160–173. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160 - DOI
-
- Evans JSBT, Curtis-Holmes J. Rapid responding increases belief bias: evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Think Reason. 2005;11(4):382–389. doi:10.1080/13546780542000005 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources