Caesarean scar pregnancy: descriptive paper of three different types of management on a series of clinical cases
- PMID: 32802015
- PMCID: PMC7422283
- DOI: 10.5114/pm.2020.97836
Caesarean scar pregnancy: descriptive paper of three different types of management on a series of clinical cases
Abstract
Introduction: A caesarean scar pregnancy is a complex iatrogenic pathology, which represents a consequence of a previous caesarean section. It increased in recent years due to parallel increase of cesarean sections.
Material and methods: We present a retrospective study on patients with caesarean scar pregnancy diagnosed in our department from June 2016 to June 2019. Stable women with an embryo (with or without cardiac activity) who accepted our experimental protocol were treated with single dose of methotrexate (50 mg administered locally intracavitary + 50 mg administered intramuscularly) and folinic acid (15 mg/day orally for 30 days). Clinically stable women with embryo (without cardiac activity) who decided to wait, were monitored by serial assays of b-hCG and clinical and ultrasonographic follow up. Women who were clinically unstable with embryo (without cardiac activity), were referred for urgent surgical treatment with dilation and curettage.
Results: Caesarean scar pregnancy was diagnosed in sixteen women. Among these women, seven were treated according to our experimental protocol with methotrexate and folinic acid and only one had profuse bleeding, which required a laparotomic hysterectomy. Four women were treated urgently with dilatation and curettage. Five women chose to wait: they were monitored and all spontaneously had a miscarriage.
Conclusions: In our preliminary study, we highlighted how our experimental protocol gave encouraging results in the first 10 weeks of caesarean scar pregnancy. However, caution is needed in patients with advanced gestational age, a gestational sac with large diameter, higher CRL and presence of embryonic cardiac activity.
Keywords: caesarean scar pregnancy; dilatation and curettage; expectant management; methotrexate; miscarriage.
Copyright © 2020 Termedia.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest
Figures
Similar articles
-
Ectopic pregnancies in caesarean section scars: 5 years experience.Clin Imaging. 2020 Oct;66:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 3. Clin Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32442857 Review.
-
Combination of medical and surgical management in successful treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a case report series.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 13;20(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03237-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 33050911 Free PMC article.
-
Management of caesarean scar pregnancy with high dose intravenous methotrexate infusion therapy: 10-year experience at a single tertiary centre.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;237:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 9. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 30999082
-
Hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;229(4):437.e1-437.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.038. Epub 2023 May 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37142075 Clinical Trial.
-
Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD011174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011174.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32609376 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Selection of Laparoscopy or Laparotomy for Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study.Int J Gen Med. 2022 Sep 13;15:7229-7240. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S369884. eCollection 2022. Int J Gen Med. 2022. PMID: 36124106 Free PMC article.
-
A combination of laparoscopy and bilateral uterine artery occlusion for the treatment of type II cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis.J Int Med Res. 2024 Apr;52(4):3000605241241010. doi: 10.1177/03000605241241010. J Int Med Res. 2024. PMID: 38663910 Free PMC article.
-
Magnitude of Cesarean Section Delivery and Its Associated Factors Among Mothers Who Gave Birth at Public Hospitals in Northern Ethiopia: Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 16;13:1563-1571. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S277747. eCollection 2020. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020. PMID: 33235456 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.BMC Womens Health. 2021 May 13;21(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01337-x. BMC Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 33985487 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effectiveness of transvaginal repair vs. hysteroscopic resection in patients with symptomatic uterine niche.Front Surg. 2023 Feb 9;10:1019237. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1019237. eCollection 2023. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36843994 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Timor-Tritsch IE, Khatib N, Monteagudo A, et al. . Cesarean Scar Pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 601-610. - PubMed
-
- Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, et al. . The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 44e1-e13. - PubMed
-
- Elson CJ, Salim R, Potdar N, et al. . on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. BJOG 2016; 123: e15-e55. - PubMed
-
- Bodur S, Özdamar O, Kiliç S, Gün I. The efficacy of the systemic methotrexate treatment in caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A quantitative review of English literature. J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 35: 290-296. - PubMed
-
- Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, et al. . Cesarean Scar Pregnancies: A Systematic Review of Treatment Options. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 21: 915-925. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources