Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;15(1):79-102.
doi: 10.1214/18-ba1142. Epub 2019 Jan 5.

Bayesian Network Marker Selection via the Thresholded Graph Laplacian Gaussian Prior

Affiliations

Bayesian Network Marker Selection via the Thresholded Graph Laplacian Gaussian Prior

Qingpo Cai et al. Bayesian Anal. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Selecting informative nodes over large-scale networks becomes increasingly important in many research areas. Most existing methods focus on the local network structure and incur heavy computational costs for the large-scale problem. In this work, we propose a novel prior model for Bayesian network marker selection in the generalized linear model (GLM) framework: the Thresholded Graph Laplacian Gaussian (TGLG) prior, which adopts the graph Laplacian matrix to characterize the conditional dependence between neighboring markers accounting for the global network structure. Under mild conditions, we show the proposed model enjoys the posterior consistency with a diverging number of edges and nodes in the network. We also develop a Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA) for efficient posterior computation, which is scalable to large-scale networks. We illustrate the superiorities of the proposed method compared with existing alternatives via extensive simulation studies and an analysis of the breast cancer gene expression dataset in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).

Keywords: gene network; generalized linear model; network marker selection; posterior consistency; thresholded graph Laplacian Gaussian prior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
An example of the graph and the corresponding correlation matrix of γ that was constructed from the inverse graph Laplacian matrix.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Two types network markers in the simulated small simple networks, where true informative nodes are marked in red. In Type 1 network marker, TF and all target genes are informative nodes. In Type 2 network marker, TF and half of target genes are informative nodes.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Two example modules of selected genes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aebersold R and Mann M (2003). “Mass spectrometry-based proteomics.” Nature, 422(6928): 198. 79 - PubMed
    1. Barabási A-L and Albert R (1999). “Emergence of scaling in random networks.” Science, 286(5439): 509–512. MR2091634. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509. 92 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barabási A-L, Gulbahce N, and Loscalzo J (2011). “Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease.” Nature reviews genetics, 12(1): 56. 79 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbieri MM, Berger JO, et al. (2004). “Optimal predictive model selection.” The annals of statistics, 32(3): 870–897. MR2065192. doi: 10.1214/009053604000000238. 88 - DOI
    1. Bhattacharya A, Pati D, Pillai NS, and Dunson DB (2015). “Dirichlet–Laplace priors for optimal shrinkage.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(512): 1479–1490. MR3449048. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.960967. 80 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources