Discontinuation of mechanical ventilation

Abstract

The vast majority of patients who undergo mechanical ventilation are able to discontinue ventilatory assistance within a few days. Typically, patients who require only short-term mechanical ventilation do not have severe underlying lung disease, and the problem for which they require ventilatory support is most commonly rapidly reversible. In these patients on short-term ventilatory support, parameters of spontaneous ventilatory requirements and respiratory muscle strength, including minute ventilation, maximal voluntary ventilation, vital capacity, and maximal inspiratory pressure, are useful in predicting the success of discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Ventilatory support can generally be discontinued by a variety of techniques in these patients without the need for weaning from the ventilator per se. The smaller group of patients in whom it is not possible to discontinue mechanical ventilation within less than 7 days comprises individuals who frequently have severe acute or chronic lung disease, multisystem extrapulmonary disease, or neuromuscular disease. After a period of prolonged mechanical ventilatory support, these complicated patients require a process of progressive weaning in which they gradually become able to support spontaneous ventilation. Spontaneous ventilatory parameters do not correlate well with weaning ability in patients on long-term ventilatory support. A systematic and comprehensive approach in which attention is focused on optimizing pulmonary and nonpulmonary factors that affect the weaning process provides the best chance for successful withdrawal of ventilatory support after long-term mechanical ventilation. Inadequate ventilatory drive, respiratory muscle weakness and fatigue, increased work of breathing, excessive CO2 production, and cardiac failure are potential mechanisms that may play a role in inhibiting successful weaning. Adverse factors relevant to each of these mechanisms must be addressed and corrected to whatever extent possible. Studies have not demonstrated the superiority of either classic T-piece weaning or IMV weaning methods in difficult-to-wean patients on long-term ventilatory support. Both techniques may be used successfully as long as all patient variables that may adversely affect weaning ability are corrected or optimized and close care and attention to the details of the weaning process itself are provided.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)