Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 30;5(31):19667-19681.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02344. eCollection 2020 Aug 11.

Process Analysis of Hydrogen Production via Biomass Gasification under Computer-Aided Safety and Environmental Assessments

Affiliations

Process Analysis of Hydrogen Production via Biomass Gasification under Computer-Aided Safety and Environmental Assessments

Samir I Meramo-Hurtado et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

The growing awareness to advance new ways to transform renewable materials for producing clean fuels, under technical and sustainable viability, is evident. In this regard, hydrogen arises as one of the cleanest and energetic biofuels in the market. This work addresses the modeling and evaluation of a biomass gasification topology employing process simulation along with an environmental and inherent safety analysis. The presented pathway considered two renewable raw materials (cassava and rice waste) based on their vast availability in north Colombia regions. We employed Aspen Plus process simulation software to model the process, setting biomasses (and ash content) as nonconventional solids in the software and inclusion of FORTRAN subroutines for handling solid properties. Otherwise, the environmental evaluation was performed applying the waste reduction algorithm (WAR). At the same time, safety assessment involves a comprehensive approach based on the inherent safety index (ISI) and the process route index (PRI) methods. Data generated from the implementation of rigorous process simulation of biomass gasification allowed us to determine the needed aspect for performing process analysis methodologies. Results revealed that this topology generates a total flow of 3944.51 kg/h with more than 97% vol of H2, from the sustainable use of 19,243 kg/h of cassava waste and 15,000 kg/h of rice straw. From the environmental viewpoint, the process showed moderately to a high overall rate of potential environmental impacts (PEIs), with a higher contribution from process sources than energy sources. It indicates that most of the generated impacts would come from self-operation than from the energy supply generation. In the case of process safety, the topology obtained an ISI score of 35, which represents that modeled gasification would operate below 50% of the expected neutral standard for a physical-chemical process. Complementing the safety evaluation, the obtained PRI suggests that compared to other processes, the analyzed topology shows relatively adequate performance considering the nature of this type of process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simulation process flowsheet diagram of biomass gasification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Global environmental impacts of the biomass gasification process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of the rate of impacts derived from process and energy contributions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Rates of environmental impacts for toxicological categories in the biomass gasification process.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Rates of environmental impacts for atmospheric categories in the biomass gasification process.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Proposed block and simulation diagram of the biomass gasification process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Suárez Tamayo S.; Molina Esquivel E. El Desarrollo Industrial y Su Impacto En El Medio Ambiente Industrial Development and Its Impact on the Environment. Rev. Cubana Hig. Epidemiol. 2014, 52, 357–363.
    1. Tilak P.; El-Halwagi M. M. Process Integration of Calcium Looping with Industrial Plants for Monetizing CO2 into Value-Added Products. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2018, 1, 191–199. 10.1016/j.crcon.2018.07.004. - DOI
    1. Rüstemoğlu H.; Andrés A. R. Determinants of CO2 Emissions in Brazil and Russia between 1992 and 2011: A Decomposition Analysis. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 58, 95–106. 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.012. - DOI
    1. Wissocq T.; Ghazouani S.; Le Bourdiec S. A Methodology for Designing Thermodynamic Energy Conversion Systems in Industrial Mass/Heat Integration Problems Based on MILP Models. Energy 2019, 185, 121–135. 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.124. - DOI
    1. Al-Aboosi F. Y.; El-Halwagi M. M.. A Stochastic Optimization Approach to the Design of Shale Gas/Oilwastewater Treatment Systems with Multiple Energy Sources under Uncertainty. Sustain .2019, 11 (). 10.3390/su11184865. - DOI