Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 17;11(1):96.
doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00899-y.

Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review

Graciano Paulo  1 , John Damilakis  2 , Virginia Tsapaki  3 , Alexander A Schegerer  4   5 , Jacques Repussard  6 , Werner Jaschke  7 , Guy Frija  8 ; European Society of Radiology
Collaborators, Affiliations

Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review

Graciano Paulo et al. Insights Imaging. .

Abstract

Background: In August 2017, the European Commission awarded the "European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference levels for X-ray Medical Imaging" project to the European Society of Radiology, to provide up-to-date Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications. The aim of this work was to conduct an extensive literature review by analysing the most recent studies published and the data provided by the National Competent Authorities, to understand the current situation regarding Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications for computed tomography.

Results: The literature review has identified 23 papers with Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications for computed tomography from 15 countries; 12 of them from Europe. A total of 28 clinical indications for 6 anatomical areas (head, cervical spine/neck, chest, abdomen, abdomen-pelvis, chest-abdomen-pelvis) have been identified.

Conclusions: In all the six anatomical areas for which Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications were found, a huge variation of computed tomography dose descriptor values was identified, providing evidence for a need to develop strategies to standardise and optimise computed tomography protocols.

Keywords: Clinical indications; Computed tomography; Computed tomography dose descriptors; Diagnostic Reference Levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. (1997) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1996;26(2). - PubMed
    1. (2001) Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. Ann ICRP 31(3):33–52 - PubMed
    1. Council of the European Union (1997) Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. Official Journal of the European Union 1997 p. 22–27.
    1. Council of the European Union (2013) Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Official Journal of the European Union 2013 p. 1–73
    1. Roch P, Célier D, Dessaud C, Etard C, Rehani MM. Long-term experience and analysis of data on diagnostic reference levels: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Eur Radiol. 2019;30(2):1127–1136. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources