Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 17;14(8):e0008415.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008415. eCollection 2020 Aug.

Generation of Loa loa infective larvae by experimental infection of the vector, Chrysops silacea

Affiliations

Generation of Loa loa infective larvae by experimental infection of the vector, Chrysops silacea

Lontum B Ndzeshang et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Basic and translational research on loiasis, a filarial nematode infection of medical importance, is impeded by a lack of suitable Loa loa infection models and techniques of obtaining and culturing life cycle stages. We describe the development of a new method for routine production of infective third-stage larvae (L3) of L. loa from the natural intermediate arthropod vector host, Chrysops silacea, following experimental infection with purified microfilariae. At 14-days post-infection of C. silacea, the fly survival rate was 43%. Survival was significantly higher in flies injected with 50 mf (55.2%) than those that received 100 mf (31.0%). However, yield per surviving fly and total yield of L3 was markedly higher in the group of flies inoculated with 100 mf (3474 vs 2462 L3 produced). The abdominal segment hosted the highest percentage recovery of L3 (47.7%) followed by head (34.5%) and thorax (17.9%). L. loa larval survival was higher than 90% after 30 days of in vitro culture. The in vitro moulting success rate to the L4 larval stage was 59.1%. After experimental infection of RAG2-/-IL-2γc-/-mice, the average L. loa juvenile adult worm recovery rate was 10.5% at 62 dpi. More than 87% of the worms were recovered from the muscles and subcutaneous tissues. Worms recovered measured an average 24.3 mm and 11.4 mm in length for females (n = 5) and males (n = 5), respectively. In conclusion, L. loa mf injected into C. silacea intrathoracically develop into infective larvae that remain viable and infective comparable to L3 obtained through natural feeding on the human host. This technique further advances the development of a full laboratory life cycle of L. loa where mf derived from experimentally-infected animals may be utilized to passage life cycle generations via intrathoracic injections of wild-caught vector hosts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Injection of Loa loa mf into C. silacea.
Here, 0.5 ml insulin syringe containing Loa loa mf is introduced to a ventral positioned Chrysops fly held with a pair of forceps.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Survival and motility monitoring of L. loa L3 derived from mf injections of C. silacea, in mammalian in vitro culture conditions.
Percentage survival curve (A) and motility curve (B) of Loa loa larvae during 30 days of culture. Plotted is the average (mean) response. Bars indicate standard deviations (SD).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Representative image of an in vitro L. loa L4 larvae and cuticle cast.
Image taken by inverted tissue culture microscope. Arrows: red = fully moulted Loa L4; black = Cast cuticle from moulted Loa L3. Scale bar 100μM.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Loa loa adult morphology 62 days post-inoculation.
(A and B) Head of young adult female stage (anterior region); Mo–mouth opening; Eo—esophagus. (c): Vulva [Vu] of mature young adult female (lateral view). (D): Open vulva, intestine, uterus of female young adult worm with no mf present (indicating that the worm is not fully developed [lateral view]). (E and F): Posterior extremity of matured young adult female worm (E; lateral view [An–anus] and F; ventral view) with caudal papillae [Pa]. (G and H) Caudal region (lateral view) of Loa loa young adult male with caudal papillae (G) and spicule (H). [A, D, E, G viewed under x10 objective, B, C viewed under x40 objective F, H viewed under x100 objective].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wanji S, Tendongfor N, Esum M, Enyong P. Chrysops silacea biting densities and transmission potential in an endemic area of human loiasis in South-West Cameroon. Trop Med Int Health. 2001;7:371–377. - PubMed
    1. Padgett JJ, Kathryn HJ. “Loiasis: African eye worm” Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:983–989. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.03.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zouré HGM, Wanji S, Mounkaïla N, Uche VA, Diggle PJ, Tekle AHT, Remme JHF. The Geographic Distribution of Loa loa in Africa: Results of Large-Scale Implementation of the Rapid Assessment Procedure for Loiasis (RAPLOA). Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2011;5(6). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lukiana T, Mandina M, Situakibanza NH, Mbula MM, Lepira BF, Odio WT, Kamgo J, Boussinesq M. A possible case of spontaneous Loa loa encephalopathy associated with a glomerulopathy. Filarial Journal. 2006;5:6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boussinesq M, Gardon J, Kamgno J, Pion SD, Gardon-Wendel N. Relationship between the prevalence and intensity of Loa loa infection in the Central province of Cameroon. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2001;95:495–507 10.1080/00034980120073184 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types