Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;68(11):2620-2628.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.16730. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

Regional Variation in Billed Advance Care Planning Visits

Affiliations

Regional Variation in Billed Advance Care Planning Visits

Lesli E Skolarus et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background/objective: Advance care planning (ACP) is associated with improved patient and caregiver outcomes, but is underutilized. To encourage ACP, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services implemented specific ACP visit reimbursement codes in 2016. To better understand the utilization of these ACP reimbursement codes, we explored regional variation in billed ACP visits.

Design: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis using a randomly sampled 5% cohort of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries' claims files from 2017. Region was defined by hospital referral region.

Setting: National Medicare FFS.

Participants: A total of 1.3 million Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older.

Measurement: Receipt of billed ACP service, identified through Current Procedural Terminology code 99497 or 99498. Proportion of beneficiaries who received billed ACP service(s) by region was calculated. We fit a multilevel logistic regression model with a random regional intercept to determine the variation in billed ACP visits attributable to the region after accounting for patient (demographics, comorbidities, and medical care utilization) and regional factors (hospital size, emergency department visits, hospice utilization, and costs).

Results: The study population included about 1.3 million beneficiaries, of which 32,137 (2.4%) had at least one billed ACP visit in 2017. There was substantial regional variation in the percentage of beneficiaries with billed ACP visits: lowest quintile region, less than 0.83%; subsequent regions, less than 1.6%, less than 2.4%, less than 3.3% to less than 8.4% in the highest quintile regions. A total of 15.4% of the variance in whether an older adult had a billed ACP visit was explained by the region. Although numerous regional factors were associated with billed ACP visits, none were strong predictors.

Conclusion: In 2017, we found wide regional variation in the use of billed ACP visits, although use overall was low in all regions. Increasing the understanding of the drivers and the effects of billed ACP visits could inform strategies for increasing ACP.

Keywords: Medicare beneficiaries; advance care planning; regional variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cohort selection diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Geographic variation in proportion of Medicare beneficiaries receiving billed ACP visits in 2017 Proportion of Medicare beneficiaries receiving ACP visits in quintiles ≤0.83 0.84-1.60 1.61-2.44 2.45-3.26 3.27-8.42
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Geographic variation in proportion of providers performing billed ACP visits in 2017 Proportion of providers performing ACP visits in quintiles ≤1.10 1.11-1.86 1.87-2.56 2.57-3.65 3.66-14.44

References

    1. Sudore RL, Lum HD, You JJ, et al. Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2017;53: 821–832.e821. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silveira MJ, Kim SY, Langa KM. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;362: 1211–1218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Houben CHM, Spruit MA, Groenen MTJ, Wouters EFM, Janssen DJA. Efficacy of Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2014;15: 477–489. - PubMed
    1. Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A, et al. Associations Between End-of-Life Discussions, Patient Mental Health, Medical Care Near Death, and Caregiver Bereavement Adjustment. JAMA. 2008;300: 1665–1673. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bischoff KE, Sudore R, Miao Y, Boscardin WJ, Smith AK. Advance Care Planning and the Quality of End-of-Life Care in Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2013;61: 209–214. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types