Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;29(9):105027.
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105027. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

Severe cognitive impairment in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Predictors and relationship to functional outcome

Affiliations

Severe cognitive impairment in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Predictors and relationship to functional outcome

Joseph R Geraghty et al. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment is common after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). However, compared to predictors of functional outcome, meaningful predictors of cognitive impairment are lacking.

Objective: Our goal was to assess which factors during hospitalization can predict severe cognitive impairment in SAH patients, especially those who might otherwise be expected to have good functional outcomes. We hypothesized that the degree of early brain injury (EBI), vasospasm, and delayed neurological deterioration (DND) would predict worse cognitive outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed SAH patient records from 2013 to 2019 to collect baseline information, clinical markers of EBI (Fisher, Hunt-Hess, and Glasgow Coma scores), vasospasm, and DND. Cognitive outcome was assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and functional outcomes by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge. SAH patients were compared to non-neurologic hospitalized controls. Among SAH patients, logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of severe cognitive impairment defined as a MoCA score <22.

Results: We screened 288 SAH and 80 control patients. Cognitive outcomes assessed via MoCA at discharge were available in 105 SAH patients. Most of these patients had good functional outcome at discharge with a mean mRS of 1.8±1.3. Approximately 56.2% of SAH patients had MoCA scores <22 compared to 28.7% of controls. Among SAH patients, modified Fisher scale was an independent predictor of cognitive impairment after adjustment for baseline differences (OR 1.638, p=0.043). MoCA score correlated inversely with mRS (r=-0.3299, p=0.0006); however, among those with good functional outcome (mRS 0-2), 48.7% still exhibited cognitive impairment.

Conclusions: Severe cognitive impairment is highly prevalent after SAH, even among patients with good functional outcome. Higher modified Fisher scale on admission is an independent risk factor for severe cognitive impairment. Cognitive screening is warranted in all SAH patients, regardless of functional outcome.

Keywords: Cognitive impairment; Delayed neurological deterioration; Fisher scale; Functional outcome; Montreal cognitive assessment; Subarachnoid hemorrhage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Retrospective study design with inclusion and exclusion criteria for SAH patients.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
SAH patients exhibit significant cognitive impairment compared to non-neurological hospitalized controls. (A) Average MoCA score for SAH patients was significantly higher than controls (19.9 ± 5.4 vs. 23.3 ± 3.7, p<0.0001) (B) Percentage of patients with MoCA <22 or ≥22 in SAH and control groups. Cognitive impairment was observed in 56.6% of SAH patients compared to 28.7% of hospitalized controls (p<0.0001).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Patients with a good functional outcome still experience significant cognitive impairment. (A) Median modified Rankin scale (mRS) of cognitively impaired patients was significantly higher in SAH patients with MoCA <22 compared to those with MoCA ≥22 (2 vs. 1, p=0.002). (B) MoCA score showed an inverse correlation with mRS suggesting that as functional outcome worsens, so does cognitive outcome (p<0.0001, r=−0.3410). (C) Percentage of patients with MoCA <22 or ≥22 based on functional outcome shows that 76.7% of patients with poor neurologic outcome while 48.7% of patients with good neurologic outcome have cognitive impairment (p=0.010).

References

    1. Johnston SC, Selvin S, Gress DR. The burden, trends, and demographics of mortality from subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 1998;50(5):1413–1418. - PubMed
    1. Rincon F, Rossenwasser RH, Dumont A. The epidemiology of admissions of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the united states. Neurosurgery 2013;73(2):217–222; discussion 212–213. - PubMed
    1. Suarez JI, Tarr RW, Selman WR. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2006;354(4):387–396. - PubMed
    1. Kreiter KT, Copeland D, Bernardini GL, et al. Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2002;33(1):200–208. - PubMed
    1. Taufique Z, May T, Meyers E, et al. Predictors of poor quality of life 1 year after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2016;78(2):256–264. - PubMed

MeSH terms