Early complications in delayed breast reconstruction: A prospective, randomized study comparing different reconstructive methods in radiated and non-radiated patients
- PMID: 32807615
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.010
Early complications in delayed breast reconstruction: A prospective, randomized study comparing different reconstructive methods in radiated and non-radiated patients
Abstract
Background: There is little high-quality scientific evidence identifying the best and safest methods for delayed breast reconstruction, with most previous studies retrospective in nature. The primary aim was to compare early complication rates for two different breast-reconstructive methods in radiated and non-radiated patients, using a validated scale. The secondary aim was to identify predictors for complications.
Materials and methods: This study represents a clinical, randomized, prospective trial (ClinicalTrials.Gov identifier: NCT03963427), where the patients were divided into two study arms: non-radiated and radiated. In the non-radiated arm, patients were randomized to a one-stage lateral thoracodorsal flap with an implant or two-stage expander reconstruction. In the radiated arm, patients were randomized to a latissimus dorsi reconstruction combined with an implant or deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) reconstruction. All adverse events were classified according to Clavien-Dindo and summarization of overall morbidity was performed by calculating the Comprehensive Complication Index score. The study was conducted from 2008 to 2020.
Results: The complication frequencies were similar for the two surgical methods within each arm. In the non-radiated arm, risk factors for any complication were any comorbidities, and in the radiated arm, factors were a high body mass index and a contralateral operation.
Conclusions: The usage of the Clavien-Dindo scale in reconstructive surgery is feasible, but further validation is needed. In non-radiated patients, the frequencies of short-term complications were similar for lateral thoracodorsal flap and expander reconstruction, whereas in radiated patients, they were similar for DIEP and latissimus dorsi. The complication profile of the methods varied.
Keywords: Breast reconstruction; Clavien-Dindo classification; Comprehensive complication index; DIEP; Expander; Flap; Implant; Latissimus dorsi flap; Randomized controlled trial.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest None.
Similar articles
-
Delayed breast reconstruction with transverse latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap using Becker expander implants in patients submitted to radiotherapy: A series of cases.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Jul;72(7):1067-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Mar 12. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019. PMID: 30948223
-
Salvage of the failed implant-based breast reconstruction using the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: A single centre experience with tertiary breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Jul;72(7):1075-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 22. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019. PMID: 30930124
-
Patient Reported Outcome and Quality of Life After Delayed Breast Reconstruction - An RCT Comparing Different Reconstructive Methods in Radiated and Non-radiated Patients.Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Dec;22(8):753-761. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 17. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022. PMID: 36210311 Clinical Trial.
-
Immediate Latissimus Dorsi and Prosthetic Reconstruction in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiation: An Analysis of 376 Breast Reconstructions.Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Jun;84(6S Suppl 5):S364-S368. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002279. Ann Plast Surg. 2020. PMID: 32039998 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does postoperative radiation therapy represent a contraindication to expander-implant based immediate breast reconstruction? An update 2012-2014.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Jun;19(12):2202-7. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26166643 Review.
Cited by
-
A review of different breast reconstruction methods.Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):3846-3855. eCollection 2023. Am J Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 37434844 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 31;10(10):CD013821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013821.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39479986
-
Implant-based versus Autologous Reconstruction after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 11;10(3):e4180. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004180. eCollection 2022 Mar. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022. PMID: 35291333 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term patient-reported back and shoulder function after delayed breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap: case-control cohort study.Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1):znad296. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad296. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 37879120 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term implant survival in delayed breast reconstruction.BJS Open. 2025 Jul 1;9(4):zraf071. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf071. BJS Open. 2025. PMID: 40613789 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical