Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 1;41(41):3998-4007.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa648.

Improved cardiovascular risk prediction using targeted plasma proteomics in primary prevention

Affiliations

Improved cardiovascular risk prediction using targeted plasma proteomics in primary prevention

Renate M Hoogeveen et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Aims: In the era of personalized medicine, it is of utmost importance to be able to identify subjects at the highest cardiovascular (CV) risk. To date, single biomarkers have failed to markedly improve the estimation of CV risk. Using novel technology, simultaneous assessment of large numbers of biomarkers may hold promise to improve prediction. In the present study, we compared a protein-based risk model with a model using traditional risk factors in predicting CV events in the primary prevention setting of the European Prospective Investigation (EPIC)-Norfolk study, followed by validation in the Progressione della Lesione Intimale Carotidea (PLIC) cohort.

Methods and results: Using the proximity extension assay, 368 proteins were measured in a nested case-control sample of 822 individuals from the EPIC-Norfolk prospective cohort study and 702 individuals from the PLIC cohort. Using tree-based ensemble and boosting methods, we constructed a protein-based prediction model, an optimized clinical risk model, and a model combining both. In the derivation cohort (EPIC-Norfolk), we defined a panel of 50 proteins, which outperformed the clinical risk model in the prediction of myocardial infarction [area under the curve (AUC) 0.754 vs. 0.730; P < 0.001] during a median follow-up of 20 years. The clinically more relevant prediction of events occurring within 3 years showed an AUC of 0.732 using the clinical risk model and an AUC of 0.803 for the protein model (P < 0.001). The predictive value of the protein panel was confirmed to be superior to the clinical risk model in the validation cohort (AUC 0.705 vs. 0.609; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: In a primary prevention setting, a proteome-based model outperforms a model comprising clinical risk factors in predicting the risk of CV events. Validation in a large prospective primary prevention cohort is required to address the value for future clinical implementation in CV prevention.

Keywords: Cardiovascular event risk; Clinical risk score; Machine learning; Prediction; Proteomics; Targeted proteomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Machine learning workflow of model construction and validation. AHT med, antihypertensive medication; BMI, body mass index; CV, cardiovascular; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PLIC, Progressione della Lesione Intimale Carotidea; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Importance plot of proteins. Relative importance of 50 proteins predictive in derivation cohort.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristics of prediction models. (A) Prediction of events with protein, clinical risk, and combined model in derivation cohort. (B) Short-term prediction (<3 years) of events with protein, clinical risk, and combined model in derivation cohort. (C) Prediction of events with protein, clinical risk, and combined model in validation cohort. AUC, area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Take-home figure
Take-home figure
Derivation and validation of a plasma proteomic model improves cardiovascular risk prediction in a primary prevention setting, demonstrating the potential of a proteomics panel to further refine risk assessment. CV, cardiovascular; NPX, Normalized Protein eXpression; PEA, proximity extension assay.
None

Comment in

References

    1. Yusuf S, Rangarajan S, Teo K, Islam S, Li W, Liu L, Bo J, Lou Q, Lu F, Liu T, Yu L, Zhang S, Mony P, Swaminathan S, Mohan V, Gupta R, Kumar R, Vijayakumar K, Lear S, Anand S, Wielgosz A, Diaz R, Avezum A, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Lanas F, Yusoff K, Ismail N, Iqbal R, Rahman O, Rosengren A, Yusufali A, Kelishadi R, Kruger A, Puoane T, Szuba A, Chifamba J, Oguz A, McQueen M, McKee M, Dagenais G. Cardiovascular risk and events in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. N Engl J Med 2014;371:818–827. - PubMed
    1. Fernández-Friera L, Fuster V, López-Melgar B, Oliva B, García-Ruiz JM, Mendiguren J, Bueno H, Pocock S, Ibáñez B, Fernández-Ortiz A, Sanz J. Normal LDL-cholesterol levels are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis in the absence of risk factors. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2979–2991. - PubMed
    1. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, Cooney M-T, Corrà U, Cosyns B, Deaton C, Graham I, Hall MS, Hobbs FDR, Løchen M-L, Löllgen H, Marques-Vidal P, Perk J, Prescott E, Redon J, Richter DJ, Sattar N, Smulders Y, Tiberi M, Worp HVD, Dis IV, Verschuren WMM; Authors/Task Force Members. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts. Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation). Eur Heart J 2016;37:2315–2381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goff DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’Agostino RB, Gibbons R, Greenland P, Lackland DT, Levy D, O’Donnell CJ, Robinson JG, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC, Sorlie P, Stone NJ, Wilson PWF. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2014;129:S49–S73. - PubMed
    1. Hoogeveen RM, Nahrendorf M, Riksen NP, Netea MG, Winther M. D, Lutgens E, Nordestgaard BG, Neidhart M, Stroes ESG, Catapano AL, Bekkering S. Monocyte and haematopoietic progenitor reprogramming as common mechanism underlying chronic inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3521–3527. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types