Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;23(10):1488-1498.
doi: 10.1111/ele.13576. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis

Affiliations

The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis

Matthias Albrecht et al. Ecol Lett. 2020 Oct.

Erratum in

  • ADDENDUM.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Ecol Lett. 2021 Aug;24(8):1738. doi: 10.1111/ele.13748. Epub 2021 Apr 27. Ecol Lett. 2021. PMID: 33982412 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Floral plantings are promoted to foster ecological intensification of agriculture through provisioning of ecosystem services. However, a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of different floral plantings, their characteristics and consequences for crop yield is lacking. Here we quantified the impacts of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control (18 studies) and pollination services (17 studies) in adjacent crops in North America, Europe and New Zealand. Flower strips, but not hedgerows, enhanced pest control services in adjacent fields by 16% on average. However, effects on crop pollination and yield were more variable. Our synthesis identifies several important drivers of variability in effectiveness of plantings: pollination services declined exponentially with distance from plantings, and perennial and older flower strips with higher flowering plant diversity enhanced pollination more effectively. These findings provide promising pathways to optimise floral plantings to more effectively contribute to ecosystem service delivery and ecological intensification of agriculture in the future.

Keywords: Agroecology; agri-environment schemes; bee pollinators; conservation biological control; ecological intensification; farmland biodiversity; floral enhancements; natural pest regulation; pollination reservoirs; sustainable agriculture; wildflower strips.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forest plot showing effects of flower strips and hedgerows on pollination and pest control service provisioning in adjacent crops compared to control crops without adjacent floral plantings. Squares illustrate predicted mean effects (z‐score estimates), bars show 95% confidence intervals (CIs). On average, pest control services were enhanced by 16% (z‐score: 0.25) in fields with adjacent flower strip compared to control fields.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted relationships between (a) mean natural pest control service and (b) mean crop pollination service (z‐scores (solid lines) ± 95% CI (dashed lines)) and in‐field distance to field border for field with (red lines; dots) or without adjacent floral planting (black lines, triangles).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predicted relationships between mean crop pollination service (z‐scores (fat solid lines) ± 95% CI (fine solid lines)) and (a) flowering plant species richness and (b) time since establishment of adjacent flower strips. Predicted relationship and results of an analysis without the points representing flower strips older than four years were qualitatively identical.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Predicted relationship between mean (a) pest control and (b) crop pollination service (z‐scores (solid lines) ± 95% CI (dashed lines)) and landscape simplification (percentage of arable crops in the landscape) in fields with adjacent floral planting (red line; red circles) or without planting (black line; black triangles). Pollination services, but not pest control services, declined with landscape simplification; the slight differences in slopes for pollination‐landscape simplification relationships of fields with or without adjacent plantings were statistically not significant.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean predicted crop yield (z‐scores; ±95% CI) of fields with adjacent flower strips (red circles) and control fields without adjacent flower strip (black triangles). The data set includes a subset of 11 studies.

References

    1. Albrecht, M. , Duelli, P. , Müller, C. , Kleijn, D. & Schmid, B. (2007). The Swiss agri‐environment scheme enhances pollinator diversity and plant reproductive success in nearby intensively managed farmland. J. Appl. Ecol., 44, 813–822.
    1. Buhk, C. , Oppermann, R. , Schanowski, A. , Bleil, R. , Lüdemann, J. & Maus, C. (2018). Flower strip networks offer promising long term effects on pollinator species richness in intensively cultivated agricultural areas. BMC Ecol., 18, 55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartomeus, I. , Gagic, V. & Bommarco, R. (2015). Pollinators, pests and soil properties interactively shape oilseed rape yield. Basic Appl. Ecol., 16, 737–745.
    1. Bátary, P. , Baldi, A. , Kleijn, D. & Tscharntke, T. (2011). Landscape‐moderated biodiversity effects of agri‐environmental management: a meta‐analysis. Proc. Royal Soc. B, 278, 1894–1902. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates, D. , Maechler, M. , Bolker, B. , Walker, S. , Christensen, R.H.B. , Singmann, H. et al (2015). Package ‘lme4’. Convergence, 12 . Available at: https://cran.r‐project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf. Last accessed 20 January 2020.